Re: The Sarah Jane Adventures (5 Tardis Poll) 5/11

On Apr 14, 2:28=A0pm, Merrick Baldelli <mbalde...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 07:24:04 GMT, Brian Henderson
>
> <BrianL.Hender...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >Anim8rFSK wrote:
> >> Yes. =A0That was a fine episode, which is probably why I found TSJA
to =
be
> >> such a letdown. =A0
>
> >Sarah Jane is a show made for little kids, not adults. =A0If you're
> >expecting another Dr. Who out of it, of course you're going to be
> >disappointed, but it's not supposed to be another Dr. Who.
>
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 I was (and still am) more entertained by earlier
episodes =
of
> "The Tomorrow People" than this. =A0Hell, I'm able to watch SpongeBob
> without having the adult in me cringing. =A0This makes me cringe, and
> that's not a good sign. =A0
>
>
>
> >> Yeah, it's only half an hour, and it's right before the season
premiere=

> >> of Dr. Who, and apparently this episode of Who does NOT have the vile
> >> Tate creature, so it might actually be watchable.
>
> >It's not the season premiere, it's the Christmas special, which is
> >really more the end of last series than the beginning of this one.
> >SciFi is just being stupid.
>
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Great... =A0Even worse. =A0They're being shown out of
orde=
r.


The previous poster wasn't really accurate.  The Christmas special
aired between Series 3 and 4.  Nothing is being shown out of order.