In article <rv3704ht5a2uj42allni03fvfnnb5399eg@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
Merrick Baldelli <mbaldelli@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 14:07:49 -0700, Anim8rFSK <ANIM8Rfsk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
>
> >The trouble is, a crummy motorcycle is such a cheap prop that they can
> >afford to have a couple of them. It's not like a modified Bell 222.
>
> That was 20 years ago.. Come into the 21st century with your
> gripes. CGI can in fact make it a bit easier for them to meet some
> parts of budget without having to look completely pixilated. Or
> having to use a Bell 222 and stock footage.
You're assuming they can afford CGI, or producers who know how to use it
properly. When you do that, you get the first Fantastic Four film.
Or for that matter either of the other more recent ones. :)
>
> >Let's face it, you CAN'T have a budget too low to do Street Hawk. IIRC
> >it was a nondescript guy on a nondescript bike with a nondescript boss
> >in a nondescript warehouse. A recurring cast of two, add some non
> >actress bimbos -- probably can get any of the "Girls Next Door" cheap,
> >or any of the interchangeable Karda****an ****s from "Bruce Jenner
> >Married Into A Family of Drooling Bimbos" or whatever the name of the
> >show is would do it free. Just use the old scripts, 'cause nobody, not
> >even you and I can remember them, and it's soup.
>
> No really... Roger Corman, is this you?
>
> Technically there were four re-occurring, besides Smith and
> Regalbuto... There was also [Richard] Venture and [Jeannie] Wilson.
> Interesting use of the words "non-actress" bimbos, given that Wilson
> was a former Miss USA winner.
Jeannie Wilson of Simon & Simon fame? Had no idea she was in it. I
just figured it followed the Knight Rider formula, where the women were
cast solely on the basis of '****ability'
--
Star Trek 09:
No Shat, No Show.
http://www.disneysub.com/board/noshat.jpg
|
