In article <p3o9049ekmkdn189ad6j9fti0mfpnigq2s@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
Merrick Baldelli <mbaldelli@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 14:26:35 -0700, Anim8rFSK <ANIM8Rfsk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
>
> >In article <rv3704ht5a2uj42allni03fvfnnb5399eg@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> > Merrick Baldelli <mbaldelli@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >
> >> On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 14:07:49 -0700, Anim8rFSK <ANIM8Rfsk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >The trouble is, a crummy motorcycle is such a cheap prop that they
can
> >> >afford to have a couple of them. It's not like a modified Bell 222.
> >>
> >> That was 20 years ago.. Come into the 21st century with your
> >> gripes. CGI can in fact make it a bit easier for them to meet some
> >> parts of budget without having to look completely pixilated. Or
> >> having to use a Bell 222 and stock footage.
> >
> >You're assuming they can afford CGI, or producers who know how to use
it
> >properly. When you do that, you get the first Fantastic Four film.
>
> And people say I'm the voice of gloom. Really... it's just a
> pipe dream and you're already tra****ng it senseless. Does someone
> need to get laid or something?
>
> >Or for that matter either of the other more recent ones. :)
>
> The CGI was acceptable for the most part. I had no problems
> suspending my disbelief in most of it, even if there were times where
> I was like, "you're kidding me, right?" Came up during a scene or
> three.
>
> Even with shoddy CGI, it'll be a significant improvement to
> say, reckless uses of stock footage over the desert where there's no
> desert to be found in Canada.
>
> >> No really... Roger Corman, is this you?
> >>
> >> Technically there were four re-occurring, besides Smith and
> >> Regalbuto... There was also [Richard] Venture and [Jeannie] Wilson.
> >> Interesting use of the words "non-actress" bimbos, given that Wilson
> >> was a former Miss USA winner.
> >
> >Jeannie Wilson of Simon & Simon fame? Had no idea she was in it. I
> >just figured it followed the Knight Rider formula, where the women were
> >cast solely on the basis of '****ability'
>
> You need to do more research through IMDB when you get up in
> here talking trash about a show and you're doing so entirely from
> memory. You're gettin' old Anim -- old enough now to be forgetting
> the more obvious stuff that you used to take advantage of 20 years
> prior (like when the show was originally on).
Nah. I didn't watch more than a few minutes of Street Hawk. That was
one even I didn't bother sitting all the way through. If I'd known
Wilson was in it I might have stuck around long enough to see her.
--
Star Trek 09:
No Shat, No Show.
http://www.disneysub.com/board/noshat.jpg
|
