Re: The Sarah Jane Adventures (5 Tardis Poll) 5/11

In article <vno9049n70gckc0timqv5uf2r9nsfc692j@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
 Merrick Baldelli <mbaldelli@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 12:45:51 -0700, Anim8rFSK <ANIM8Rfsk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
> 
> >> >> Yeah, it's only half an hour, and it's right before the season
premiere 
> >> >> of Dr. Who, and apparently this episode of Who does NOT have the
vile 
> >> >> Tate creature, so it might actually be watchable.
> >> >
> >> >It's not the season premiere, it's the Christmas special, which is 
> >> >really more the end of last series than the beginning of this one. 
> >> >SciFi is just being stupid.
> >> 
> >> 	Great...  Even worse.  They're being shown out of order.
> >
> >Would YOU start with an episode with the Tate-beast in it?
> 
> 	I wouldn't know...  I've only half-tuned into Doctor Who the
> last couple of years.  Eccleston appealed to me only marginally, and
> Tennant even less so.  I only jumped into this particular thread
> because I could talk somewhat knowledgeably on the subject of the
> Sarah Jane Adventures, which is the title of this thread.  
> 	I hadn't become aware that Doctor Who had been interchangeable
> through out this until there was talking about Tate, Christmas Shows
> and Doctor Who.  
> 
> 	Frankly, seeing Tate in a couple of snippets here and there on
> YouTube, I don't find her as "beasty" as you do.  While she doesn't
> appeal to my sense of taste, I don't seem to be as repulsed as you.

Small snippets would help.  She's the Tara King of Doctor Who.

-- 
Star Trek 09:

No Shat, No Show.
http://www.disneysub.com/board/noshat.jpg