Re: BSG+ Centauri A, B, C and Cally (was Re: Anyone else notice...)

In article <6748etF2n87ccU3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
KalElFan <kalelfan@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>"Brad Templeton" <btm@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>news:iPOdnYkU2Jf8WpHVnZ2dnUVZ_vmlnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> She did shoot the zodiac.   Her camera seems more than adequate.
>> They did study the photos quite carefully.   I'm not making it up.
>
>You are making up that because she shot a picture, it has detail
>in it that would allow them to pinpoint Earth's location.  ALL that
>it has is the same general picture that they got from the temple.
>
>If your nitpick were working (and it ain't), then it wouldn't even
>need the Starbuck trip to Earth and photograph of its sky.  What
>you're effectively arguing is that the Earth sky information from the
>temple ought to have been good enough for their supercomputers
>(or whatever technology you think they have) to figure out where
>Earth was.  There's no reason to think that's the case.

I tire of your discussion style, so I won't reply further.
-- 
The history of the net in bullet points
	http://www.templetons.com/brad/nethist.html