Re: "The Sarah Jane Adventures" 5 Tardis Poll 4/18

In article <DvadnRw1-f0Yd5PVnZ2dnUVZ_g6dnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
Dennis M. Hammes <scrawlmark@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>Carol Hague wrote:
>
>> Edward Cowling London UK <edward@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>>In a way it's a shame the BBC got it's dedicated kids TV channels. If
>>>Sarah Jane was on say BBC2 then I'd happily watch it or record it to 
>>>watch later. But it seems a bit odd for an adult to record something
off
>>>the kids channel !
>> 
>> 
>> a)  If it's worth watching, it's worth watching, regardless of what
>> channel it's on
>> 
>> b) It gets repeated on BBC1 anyway.
>> 
>
>So you're saying Who's on First?
>   (Then -- what's on Second?)
>
>> 
>>>I do wonder if Dr Who started today on CBBC, how long it would have 
>>>lasted and how many adults would have ever seen it ?
>> 
>> 
>> Doctor Who is not and has never been a children's programme. A *family*
>> one, yes, but that's not the same thing.
>> 
>
>Of course not.  I recall an episode in which Tom Baker released some 
>large Alsatians to distract, even savage, a couple of poor, obsessed 
>Daleks who were trying to repaint the tardis a rather hideous shade 
>of puce.
>   That's right -- Who let the dogs out.
>   (Not a thing you want children watching alone.)
>

Which episode?
-- 
Member - Liberal International	
This is doctor@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 doctor@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising!  
USA petition for dissolution of your nation!