Re: Torchwood--So do they not have ***ual harrassment laws across

Anim8rFSK wrote:

> In article <atropos-6D6C41.06315423042008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>  Thanatos <atropos@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> 
> 
>>In article <ANIM8Rfsk-B70CA4.21405522042008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>> Anim8rFSK <ANIM8Rfsk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>In article <atropos-6D3901.23152622042008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>>> Thanatos <atropos@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>In article <mZuPj.9656$aq4.7104@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>>>> peachy a****e passion <exquisitepeach@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Thanatos wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>In article <Al9Pj.11031$Zk5.7702@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>>>>>> peachy a****e passion <exquisitepeach@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Terribly sorry that the new laws make some folks
>>>>>>>uncomfortable, but women voting isn't the end of the
>>>>>>>world, gay marriage doesn't make it okay to marry
>>>>>>>your dog, and laws against actual inappropriate ***ual 
>>>>>>>harrassment doesn't mean that anything anyone ever
>>>>>>>says or does is illegal just if a woman decides so
>>>>>>>on a whim.
>>>>
>>>>>>Actually we just had our annual ***ual harassment PC
>>>>>>indoctrination class and in the federal government, a
>>>>>>woman can indeed decide that something is retroactive
>>>>>>harassment-- even if she explicitly invited the 
>>>>>>behavior at the time.
>>>>
>>>>>I strongly suggest that this is not what they intended
>>>>>you to take away from your training.
>>>>
>>>>Oh, I agree with you. I'm quite certain my feelings on
>>>>the subject aren't at all what they'd like me to believe.
>>>>Of course even saying you disagree with the law/policy is
>>>>an actionable offense these days. They made that quite clear. 
>>>>It's all very fascist.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>After all, your position sugests that you may as well
>>>>>do any damn thing you want, because there is absolutely
>>>>>nothing you can do that is safe.
>>>>
>>>>You noticed that, too? Glad I'm not the only one.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>In fact, I've been through the federal government
>>>>>training, and that's not what they teach.
>>>>
>>>>When was the last time? It gets more ridiculous every
>>>>year. You may have just been through a saner version.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>It is, however, inevitably what some folks took away from
>>>>>it, when they went into it with the mindset that the whole
>>>>>thing was stupid to start with.
>>>>
>>>>The sad truth is that most of it *is* pretty stupid to begin with.
>>>
>>>The entire system collapsed the moment they decided to rely on the 
>>>'reasonable woman' standard.
>>
>>I could probably be fired just for reading that.
> 
> 
> I'm sure I will be when Peachie reads it.
> 

    Gosh.  I wasn't even aware you worked for me.




-- 
Usenet is like Tetris for people who still remember how to read. -Joshua 
Heller

If ignorance is bliss, why aren’t more people happy?