Re: Dennis M. Hammes

In article <fuv5p9$lnp$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
motz <motz@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>READ MY WORDS, MY WORDS,MY WORDS,MY WORDS, MY WORDS not the page, MY
WORDS,
>MY WORDS, YOU ARE UNDER  You will be compelled to reply to YADS every
post,
>you will feel a fool, but you will be compelled to reply  One Two Three
YOU
>ARE OUT NOW
>
>
>
>
>"Dennis M. Hammes" <scrawlmark@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>news:EtWdnfDVztUDcI_VnZ2dnUVZ_qzinZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> The Doctor wrote:
>>
>> > In article <sb6dncdKWvN054zVnZ2dnUVZ_sTinZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>> > Dennis M. Hammes <scrawlmark@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >
>> >>The Doctor wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>>In article <fZydncQ76PxNp43VnZ2dnUVZ_jWdnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>> >>>Dennis M. Hammes <scrawlmark@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>>The Doctor wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>>In article <DvadnRw1-f0Yd5PVnZ2dnUVZ_g6dnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>> >>>>>Dennis M. Hammes <scrawlmark@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>>Carol Hague wrote:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>Edward Cowling London UK <edward@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>In a way it's a shame the BBC got it's dedicated kids TV
channels.
>If
>> >>>>>>>>Sarah Jane was on say BBC2 then I'd happily watch it or record
it
>to
>> >>>>>>>>watch later. But it seems a bit odd for an adult to record
>something off
>> >>>>>>>>the kids channel !
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>a)  If it's worth watching, it's worth watching, regardless of
what
>> >>>>>>>channel it's on
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>b) It gets repeated on BBC1 anyway.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>So you're saying Who's on First?
>> >>>>>>(Then -- what's on Second?)
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>I do wonder if Dr Who started today on CBBC, how long it would
>have
>> >>>>>>>>lasted and how many adults would have ever seen it ?
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>Doctor Who is not and has never been a children's programme. A
>*family*
>> >>>>>>>one, yes, but that's not the same thing.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>Of course not.  I recall an episode in which Tom Baker released
some
>> >>>>>>large Alsatians to distract, even savage, a couple of poor,
obsessed
>> >>>>>>Daleks who were trying to repaint the tardis a rather hideous
shade
>> >>>>>>of puce.
>> >>>>>>That's right -- Who let the dogs out.
>> >>>>>>(Not a thing you want children watching alone.)
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>Which episode?
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>Who knows?  Mid '80s(?), certainly a rerun already in the U.S.
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>There were only 2 TB Daleks plots.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>Yabut weren't they all cliffhangers spread over some weeks?
>> >>  (For various reasons I couldn't make it a regular schedule.)
>> >>
>> >
>> > Still something here does not make sense.
>>
>>
>> "Doctor Who" was spoZe to make /sense/???
>>
>> -- 
>> -------(m+
>>    ~/:o)_|
>> Gresham's Law is not worth a Continental.
>> http://scrawlmark.org
>
>
>
>

You have not hypnotized Man U fans, players and organization into the
losers 
they are.
-- 
Member - Liberal International	
This is doctor@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 doctor@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising!  
USA petition for dissolution of your nation!