Re: NBC's "brilliant" plan backfires

On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 17:09:27 -0500, Alric Knebel wrote:
> 
> Anim8rFSK wrote:
> 
>> In article <1YOQj.130$uS1.116@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>>  "Patient Zero 2.0.....LOrd Gow/Ann Coulter 3:14 says..The only good 
>>  Democrat is a dead Democrat! .Still #1 in the hearts of RSPW" 
>>  <noonan24_7@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>>http://www.slate.com/id/2189559/
>> 
>> 
>> Idiots.  Just a list of possible plotlines would have told them if they

>> were on the same page.
>> -- 
>> Star Trek 09:
>>
>> No Shat, No Show.
>> http://www.disneysub.com/board/noshat.jpg
>
> 
> What's with this stupid signature?  Can someone explain what that means?

>    Is this one of those TOS dickheads who thinks that anything after 
> that was a travesty?  Please, tell me these guys are a dying breed.  The

> rest of the world has moved on, and most of the Star Trek incarnations 
> have been pretty good, and a couple of them were even BETTER than TOS.
> 
> (I'm sort of embarrassed that I even know what "TOS" means.)

I followed the link, and there's nothing there.  What's it got to do with
TOS Star Trek (I know what it means, too, but I'm not embarrassed)?  If
you
go to the site the link was located on, it was a site about the Nautilus
from the Disney movie 20K UNDER THE SEA.  The link was on one of the
boards.  

What was there?  

-- 
B-12
____________________________________________
http://www.vegsource.com/attwood/vitB-12.htm