Re: NBC's "brilliant" plan backfires

On Apr 27, 6:09 pm, Alric Knebel <al...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Anim8rFSK wrote:
> > In article <1YOQj.130$uS1.116@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> >  "Patient Zero 2.0.....LOrd Gow/Ann Coulter 3:14 says..The only good
> >  Democrat is a dead Democrat! .Still #1 in the hearts of RSPW"
> >  <noonan2...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >>http://www.slate.com/id/2189559/
>
> > Idiots.  Just a list of possible plotlines would have told them if
they
> > were on the same page.
> > --
> > Star Trek 09:
>
> > No Shat, No Show.
> >http://www.disneysub.com/board/noshat.jpg>
>
> What's with this stupid signature?  Can someone explain what that means?
>    Is this one of those TOS dickheads who thinks that anything after
> that was a travesty?  Please, tell me these guys are a dying breed.  The
> rest of the world has moved on, and most of the Star Trek incarnations
> have been pretty good, and a couple of them were even BETTER than TOS.
>
> (I'm sort of embarrassed that I even know what "TOS" means.)

Something other than "terms of service"?