In article <t4qdnTuQqMpE6YHVnZ2dnUVZ_t-nnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
"Mac Breck" <macthevorlon@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Anim8rFSwrote:
> In article <VvWdnZXRloXGkYHVnZ2dnUVZ_j-dnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> "Mac Breck" <macthevorlon@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> Garondo Marondo wrote:
> >>On May 2, 3:29 pm, David <dimla...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>
> http://community.tvguide.com/blog-entry/TVGuide-Editors-Blog/Ausiello...
> >>>>
> >>>> Ausiello Report
> >>>> Exclusive: Inside CSI'Battle for Katee Sackhoff
> >>>>
> >>>> This is seriouslfrakked up.
> >>>>
> >>>> Sourceconfirm to me exclusively that Battlestar Galactica's
> >>>> ass-kickinKatee Sackhoff was thisclose to becoming Jorja Fox's
> >>>> pseudo-replacement next season on CSI. In factshe was considered
> >>>> to be such lock for the new series-regular role of Bryce Adams
> >>>> that exec producerCarol Mendelsohn and Naren Shankar, both huge
> >>>> fans of thactress, were practically rolling a red carpet all the
> >>>> wato her trailer.
> >>>>
> >>>> But...
> >>>>
> >>>> Ohcome on, you knew there was a "but" coming. After seeing
> >>>> Sackhoff read fothe part of the sexy new CSI on the graveyard
> >>>> shift, executives at both CB(who declined to comment for this
> >>>> story) anJerry Bruckheimer Television remained unconvinced that
> >>>> they hafound their Bryce. And, unfortunately, their opinion won
> >>>> out.
> >>>>
> >>>> Told yoit was a frakked-up story.
> >>>>
> >>>> Now, throle is once again up for grabs, I'm once again bummed,
> >>>> anso once again I'm turning to you for opinions. Who do you
> >>>> thinwas right the creative folks or the suits? Weigh in below.
> >>>> Anthen watch my super-fun interview with Ms. Sackhoff from last
> >>>> night'TV Guide's 2008 Sexiest Stars soiree a portion of which
> >>>> I'saving for next week's vodcast because, well, it's just that
> >>>> good>>>
> >>This is the show's lose.
> >>
> >> Thpseudo-replacement for Jorja Fox is a sexy new CSI? Why? Jorja
> >> nevewas.
> > I don't watch CSI, but she was on The West Wing.
> >>
> >> MsSackhoff, sexy? In what universe? Compared to whom, Ruth
> >> Buzzi'character (the one with wrenches in her purse) on Laugh In?
> > Buzzi's old woman might have been sexier if you got the gear off her.
> Sackoff, not so much.
>
> Remember thhair net with the spiderweb hub in the center of her
> forehead
> >> *IF* threplacement is to be a sexy new CSI on the graveyard shift,
> >> Sackhoff woulbe an example of miscasting. For once, the suits were
> >> right. Certainlnot the show's loss.
> > Well, if Sackoff is going to be on a show, I'd rather it was a show I
> didn't watch.
>
> Same here However, *I watch CSI*. BTW, on CSI, Liz Vassey's gorgeous
> (and smart, anhas a sense of fun), and so is Louise Lombard most of
> thtime. Marg's middle aged, but she still looks damned fine to me.
> Althree are have some depth, and are not the typical "looks and
> nothinelse" type of character.
>
> --
> MaBreck (KoshN)
> ------------------------------"The Dresden Files" (2007)
> HarrDresden: [re. Bianca] What is it about bad girls? They lie,
> cheat, won'suck your blood even when you beg them to, and for some
> reasonno matter how badly they treat us, we still can't walk away.
Wow, Mack, that was just unpleasant. :\
--
Star Trek 09:
No Shat, No Show.
|
