Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series

On Apr 6, 3:32=A0pm, Pete B <xxxh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> In article <ftb86i$c6...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, hanaram857
> @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 says...
>
> > There are still alot of unexplored avenues with the sort of
established
> > history this show has.
>
> Indeed, but this is the way they want to go.
>
> (Of course there is the alien race in "Scorched Earth" - would be
> interesting to learn more about them)
>
> > We havent met the Furlings.
>
> Nor are we likely to, the powers the be seems to think it was a stupid
> name they came up with, that it sounds like "furry" and thusly wont
> return to them (lame yes)
>

Where did you hear this from?

> Though Rob Cooper pointed out the amusing coincidence that "Furlings" is
> an anagram of FunGirls *g*
>
> > In any case I would
> > definitely like to see the special effects to be excellent from the
very=

> > start, I was disappointed with the suits of armor in the series
compared=
 to
> > the armor from the movies when the series first came out.Yes, I know,
it=
 was
> > expensive.
>
> Yeah Brad Wright has said he would like more money to do this series or
> he may not be interested at all. Would be a downer to go to a far away
> galaxy and it looks like a forrest in canada...

Oh yeah, I've had enough of the British Columbia-looking planets. Come
on,
we need to see something more exotic.