

|
 |
| << Topic |
< Post |
Post 24 of 124 Topic 10099 of 10440
|
Post > |
Topic >> |
Re: Sci-Fi gets "Ghost Whisperer," "Star Trek: TNG," "Charmed," "Highlander,"
by Michael Bowker <mikeb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
May 5, 2008 at 09:14 PM
| Anim8rFSK wrote:
> In article <yeGdnZPeW7b9WILVnZ2dnUVZ_oninZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> Michael Bowker <mikeb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>> Anim8rFSK wrote:
>>> In article <oYGdnStU9-tb9oLVnZ2dnUVZ_umdnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>>> jewahe <j.hanvey@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>
>>>> PV wrote:
>>>>> "Obveeus" <Obveeus@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
>>>>>> The Next Generation, being the best of the Star Trek series, is
most
>>>>>> certainly not 'crap'.
>>>>> Except that TNG isn't even the second best Star Trek series (if you
>>>>> include
>>>>> TOS), and most of it *is* crap that doesn't survive rewatching. *
>>>> Except that it isn't. It is the best of the ST series.
>>> Third best. Fourth, if you count TAS.
>>>> TOS was too much a product of its times. Some of the episodes have
>>>> withstood time, but it's overall look and language dates it too much.
>>>> What's more, the series often became tiresome with its
>>>> monster-of-the-week repetitions.
>>> We'll have to agree to disagree.
>>>> DS9 was incredibly inconsistent with plot and character, and too
often
>>>> descended into soap-opera plotting.
>>> It's last season was awful, and it's finale a crime against humanity,
>>> but overall it was much better than any Trek since real Trek.
>>>> VOY, of course, might as well have been a stand-along series, without
>>>> any regards to the established universe. When the plots weren't just
>>>> plain inane, they were too much of a soap-opera. And the characters
were
>>>> very inconsistent, annoying, or useless.
>>> Yes
>>>> ENT, like VOY, discarded the established universe and just couldn't
>>>> figure out what it wanted to be about.
>>> It wanted to be about crap, and succeded spectacularly.
>>>> TNG, at least, attempted to be consistent (both in its own universe
and
>>>> the greater ST universe), broke new ground in many of the plots and
>>>> devices, and distinguished itself effectively from the past
incarnations.
>>> I disagree. Almost every time they started something interesting, a
bad
>>> case of 'our writers are idiots' destroyed it.
>>>> While I'd agree that Seasons 1 - 2 were weak (suffering from
turnover, a
>>>> writers' strike, and the normal growing pains) even many of those
>>>> episodes resonate with events that are going on in today's world. By
>>>> Season 3, the show had found its voice and direction, and started
>>>> consistently producing extremely good and entertaining television.
>>> Granted one is weak. Two is better by virtue of less Crusher. But
it's
>>> last two seasons produced some of the worst shows ever put on
>>> television.
>>>
>>> I doubt there are more than 3 or 4 watchable TNG eps in any given
season.
>>>
>>> Whenever it comes on and I catch it by accident, I watch for 3 or 4
>>> minutes until I say "oh, this is a bad one" and turn it off.
>>>
>>> I doubt there are more than half a dozen TNG eps I wouldn't classify
>>> that way. The last one I watched again was RELICS, and it succumbed
to
>>> 'our writers are idiots'
>>>> One of my biggest complaints about DS9 and VOY, in fact, is that they
>>>> ran many of the themes introduced (and often done extremely well) in
TNG
>>>> into the ground, and never distinguished themselves sufficiently from
>>>> the series. These themes mostly revolve around the exploration of
>>>> individual "species-ness": Data's quest for humanity, Worf's quest
for
>>>> Klingon-ness, etc...these stories repeat ad infinitum in the arcs
>>>> followed by Ba****r, Dax, Torres, Seven, Tuvok, etc.
>>>>
>>>> The biggest weakness of TNG is that it did tend towards preachiness
>>>> (especially in S5, when the actors were allowed to introduce their
pet
>>>> causes into the show), the insistence of keeping Troi (and her
mother)
>>>> as an active cast member, and the reliance on too much techno-babble.
>>> Agreed. So it's last 3 seasons were bad. So: Bad: 1,2,5,6,7. Good:
>>> 3,4.
>>>> As far as re-watchability goes, I can sit through a lot more TNG
>>>> episodes than I can DS9 or VOY episodes - and I often don't have the
>>>> desire to watch episodes of the later series at all.
>>> Agree, Voyager and Enterprise have no repeat value except to laugh or
>>> howl.
>>>
>> I raise it to ten or so, but agree with the other points.
>
> 10 *per season*? That's like 50%. I think that's way high, given that
> there are entire seasons approaching zero.
>
No ten total, perhaps I misunderstood?


|
124 Posts in Topic:
|
David <dimlan17@[EMAIL |
2008-05-05 01:58:59 |
|
Anim8rFSK <ANIM8Rfsk@[ |
2008-05-05 06:23:08 |
|
"Obveeus" <O |
2008-05-05 10:02:40 |
|
Anim8rFSK <ANIM8Rfsk@[ |
2008-05-05 10:38:00 |
|
Steve Hall <shall1@[EM |
2008-05-05 15:07:25 |
|
jayembee <jayembeenosp |
2008-05-05 18:56:40 |
|
Anim8rFSK <ANIM8Rfsk@[ |
2008-05-05 14:21:26 |
|
Anim8rFSK <ANIM8Rfsk@[ |
2008-05-05 14:20:36 |
|
"Obveeus" <O |
2008-05-05 16:21:01 |
|
"Jason Maxwell" |
2008-05-05 20:54:14 |
|
Anim8rFSK <ANIM8Rfsk@[ |
2008-05-05 20:27:09 |
|
Jack Bohn <jackbohn@[E |
2008-05-06 06:21:37 |
|
Anim8rFSK <ANIM8Rfsk@[ |
2008-05-06 05:42:09 |
|
Jack Bohn <jackbohn@[E |
2008-05-06 18:27:39 |
|
Anim8rFSK <ANIM8Rfsk@[ |
2008-05-06 18:18:23 |
|
ravenlynne <ravenlynne |
2008-05-07 07:58:39 |
|
Anim8rFSK <ANIM8Rfsk@[ |
2008-05-06 23:16:05 |
|
ravenlynne <ravenlynne |
2008-05-07 08:24:03 |
|
pv+usenet@[EMAIL PROTECTE |
2008-05-05 14:05:02 |
|
jewahe <j.hanvey@[EMAI |
2008-05-05 16:22:57 |
|
Anim8rFSK <ANIM8Rfsk@[ |
2008-05-05 14:29:44 |
|
Michael Bowker <mikeb@ |
2008-05-05 19:40:11 |
|
Anim8rFSK <ANIM8Rfsk@[ |
2008-05-05 20:23:04 |
|
Michael Bowker <mikeb@ |
2008-05-05 21:14:02 |
|
Anim8rFSK <ANIM8Rfsk@[ |
2008-05-05 22:48:15 |
|
Michael Bowker <mikeb@ |
2008-05-06 19:32:16 |
|
Anim8rFSK <ANIM8Rfsk@[ |
2008-05-06 22:00:44 |
|
pv+usenet@[EMAIL PROTECTE |
2008-05-05 17:30:10 |
|
sef@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(S |
2008-05-05 23:21:58 |
|
sef@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(S |
2008-05-05 23:26:20 |
|
Anim8rFSK <ANIM8Rfsk@[ |
2008-05-05 17:19:03 |
|
pv+usenet@[EMAIL PROTECTE |
2008-05-06 13:05:59 |
|
Michael Bowker <mikeb@ |
2008-05-05 19:41:29 |
|
Anim8rFSK <ANIM8Rfsk@[ |
2008-05-05 20:23:35 |
|
Michael Bowker <mikeb@ |
2008-05-05 21:14:53 |
|
pv+usenet@[EMAIL PROTECTE |
2008-05-06 13:10:39 |
|
Michael Bowker <mikeb@ |
2008-05-06 19:27:35 |
|
Anim8rFSK <ANIM8Rfsk@[ |
2008-05-06 22:00:28 |
|
ravenlynne <ravenlynne |
2008-05-07 07:51:11 |
|
Anim8rFSK <ANIM8Rfsk@[ |
2008-05-06 23:15:34 |
|
ravenlynne <ravenlynne |
2008-05-07 08:23:25 |
|
"Victor Velazquez&qu |
2008-05-07 07:51:47 |
|
Anim8rFSK <ANIM8Rfsk@[ |
2008-05-07 06:39:14 |
|
"Victor Velazquez&qu |
2008-05-07 08:45:10 |
|
ravenlynne <ravenlynne |
2008-05-07 17:39:11 |
|
Anim8rFSK <ANIM8Rfsk@[ |
2008-05-07 06:37:17 |
|
"Jason Maxwell" |
2008-05-05 20:57:57 |
|
Anim8rFSK <ANIM8Rfsk@[ |
2008-05-05 20:28:57 |
|
"Jason Maxwell" |
2008-05-06 08:16:26 |
|
pv+usenet@[EMAIL PROTECTE |
2008-05-06 13:14:49 |
|
Michael Bowker <mikeb@ |
2008-05-05 19:37:41 |
|
Anim8rFSK <ANIM8Rfsk@[ |
2008-05-05 20:21:38 |
|
Alric Knebel <alric@[E |
2008-05-05 11:58:16 |
|
Sean Walsh <seanocity@ |
2008-05-05 06:33:31 |
|
Anim8rFSK <ANIM8Rfsk@[ |
2008-05-05 10:37:16 |
|
Michael Bowker <mikeb@ |
2008-05-05 19:42:32 |
|
"Obveeus" <O |
2008-05-05 09:58:28 |
|
"Victor Velazquez&qu |
2008-05-05 09:16:38 |
|
Sean Walsh <seanocity@ |
2008-05-05 09:40:08 |
|
Michael Bowker <mikeb@ |
2008-05-05 19:43:25 |
|
jayembee <jayembeenosp |
2008-05-06 03:24:36 |
|
Michael Bowker <mikeb@ |
2008-05-05 21:16:50 |
|
Zombie Elvis <DELETEME |
2008-05-06 01:27:40 |
|
jayembee <jayembeenosp |
2008-05-05 18:54:07 |
|
"Obveeus" <O |
2008-05-05 16:24:49 |
|
"Patient Zero 2.0... |
2008-05-05 20:34:04 |
|
"Default User" |
2008-05-05 20:44:34 |
|
pv+usenet@[EMAIL PROTECTE |
2008-05-05 17:32:08 |
|
jayembee <jayembeenosp |
2008-05-05 23:08:43 |
|
Michael Bowker <mikeb@ |
2008-05-05 19:44:43 |
|
"Obveeus" <O |
2008-05-06 08:06:28 |
|
Anim8rFSK <ANIM8Rfsk@[ |
2008-05-06 05:43:01 |
|
"Obveeus" <O |
2008-05-06 10:16:05 |
|
Anim8rFSK <ANIM8Rfsk@[ |
2008-05-06 08:42:18 |
|
"Obveeus" <O |
2008-05-06 14:50:38 |
|
pv+usenet@[EMAIL PROTECTE |
2008-05-06 13:21:53 |
|
"Obveeus" <O |
2008-05-06 14:49:26 |
|
mchary@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
2008-05-06 19:48:07 |
|
"Obveeus" <O |
2008-05-06 15:58:57 |
|
mchary@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
2008-05-06 20:08:33 |
|
Anim8rFSK <ANIM8Rfsk@[ |
2008-05-06 14:08:03 |
|
jayembee <jayembeenosp |
2008-05-06 22:38:13 |
|
"Obveeus" <O |
2008-05-06 20:53:09 |
|
Anim8rFSK <ANIM8Rfsk@[ |
2008-05-06 18:32:27 |
|
jayembee <jayembeenosp |
2008-05-07 05:50:26 |
|
Anim8rFSK <ANIM8Rfsk@[ |
2008-05-06 23:15:04 |
|
jayembee <jayembeenosp |
2008-05-07 06:19:41 |
|
Anim8rFSK <ANIM8Rfsk@[ |
2008-05-07 06:36:46 |
|
"Obveeus" <O |
2008-05-07 09:39:03 |
|
pv+usenet@[EMAIL PROTECTE |
2008-05-07 10:01:35 |
|
jayembee <jayembeenosp |
2008-05-07 18:26:52 |
|
"Obveeus" <O |
2008-05-07 14:43:47 |
|
jayembee <jayembeenosp |
2008-05-07 18:56:16 |
|
"Obveeus" <O |
2008-05-07 15:40:46 |
|
jayembee <jayembeenosp |
2008-05-07 20:26:27 |
|
"Obveeus" <O |
2008-05-07 16:52:14 |
|
jayembee <jayembeenosp |
2008-05-07 22:35:19 |
|
mchary@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
2008-05-08 14:57:37 |
|
Anim8rFSK <ANIM8Rfsk@[ |
2008-05-07 16:20:52 |
|
Anim8rFSK <ANIM8Rfsk@[ |
2008-05-06 18:18:50 |
|
Anim8rFSK <ANIM8Rfsk@[ |
2008-05-06 18:19:15 |
|
ravenlynne <ravenlynne |
2008-05-07 07:55:10 |
|
jayembee <jayembeenosp |
2008-05-07 06:10:21 |
|
mchary@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
2008-05-07 16:34:19 |
|
Anim8rFSK <ANIM8Rfsk@[ |
2008-05-07 11:16:03 |
|
ravenlynne <ravenlynne |
2008-05-07 20:17:09 |
|
jayembee <jayembeenosp |
2008-05-07 18:23:55 |
|
ravenlynne <ravenlynne |
2008-05-07 21:25:12 |
|
Anim8rFSK <ANIM8Rfsk@[ |
2008-05-07 11:49:59 |
|
ravenlynne <ravenlynne |
2008-05-07 21:25:46 |
|
Anim8rFSK <ANIM8Rfsk@[ |
2008-05-07 12:40:54 |
|
pv+usenet@[EMAIL PROTECTE |
2008-05-06 15:36:53 |
|
jayembee <jayembeenosp |
2008-05-06 22:29:36 |
|
mchary@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
2008-05-07 16:42:52 |
|
Anim8rFSK <ANIM8Rfsk@[ |
2008-05-07 11:17:12 |
|
mchary@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
2008-05-07 18:33:15 |
|
pv+usenet@[EMAIL PROTECTE |
2008-05-07 16:50:51 |
|
mchary@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
2008-05-08 15:03:39 |
|
jayembee <jayembeenosp |
2008-05-08 20:15:19 |
|
mchary@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
2008-05-07 16:41:24 |
|
pv+usenet@[EMAIL PROTECTE |
2008-05-06 15:32:15 |
|
wdstarr@[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
2008-05-11 03:22:15 |
|
pv+usenet@[EMAIL PROTECTE |
2008-05-12 11:44:46 |
|
Anim8rFSK <ANIM8Rfsk@[ |
2008-05-06 14:06:17 |
|
Post A Reply:

|
|
|
|