Re: The (possible) NEXT Stargate series

On May 6, 3:12=A0pm, Anybody <anyb...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> In article
> <7065699e-3279-4b90-8759-a952b2a99...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>
>
>
>
>
> mike3 <mike4...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > On May 3, 8:46=A0pm, Anybody <anyb...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > In article
> > > <a48c3e31-68d7-42ff-a40c-70ceac92c...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>
> > > mike3 <mike4...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > > On Apr 6, 3:32=A0pm, Pete B <xxxh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > > > Yeah Brad Wright has said he would like more money to do this
seri=
es or
> > > > > he may not be interested at all. Would be a downer to go to a
far =
away
> > > > > galaxy and it looks like a forrest in canada...
>
> > > > Oh yeah, I've had enough of the British Columbia-looking planets.
Co=
me
> > > > on, we need to see something more exotic.
>
> > > Australia is cheap (relative to the US anyway) to film in as well,
so
> > > maybe the next planets will look like the outback or aliens look
like
> > > the Crocodile Hunter. =A0;-)
>
> > Heh. You sure it would still be cheaper to film there though, given
> > that the MGM studios for Stargate are located in Canada?
>
> It's unlikely, but it *MIGHT* work out cheaper to ****p and/or re-build
> the sets in Australia rather than stay in Canada. Only the
> bean-counters would really know that answer. =A0 :-)

Hmm.