On 10 May 2008 15:03:47 GMT, It's the Principle! wrote:
>
> In other words, they started things without knowing how they would end
> them, and the numbers is one thing that was great, but once they had to
> explain the purpose, they were dead in the water.
>
> I have a feeling there are a LOT of questions like this they cop out
> and not answer with that "it will demystify it" crap.
I was suspicious of the same thing, and tuned out after a couple of
episodes. I don't care how many details the fans watch and analyze and
write about, none of it's going to fit together in any satisfying way.
The
best thing with these shows with these long story arcs (which are the best
in TV, and have the greatest potential) is to have a set number of
episodes, and have it resolved as a stopping point. This story going on
for literally YEARS now is just ridiculous.
--
Walking Shtick
"I'll spit in your eye."
http://www.jdmpics.com/walking-stick.htm
|
