"It's the Principle!" <brandykat@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:Xns9A9A665B8B3358675309@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> David <dimlan17@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in rec.arts.tv:
>
>
>
> > D.L.: There are some questions that are very engaging and
> > interesting, and then there are other questions that we have no
> > interest whatsoever in answering. We call it the midi-chlorian
> > debate,
> > because at a certain point, explaining something mystical demystifies
> > it. To try and have a character come and say, "Here is what the
> > numbers mean," actually makes every usage of the numbers up to that
> > point less interesting.
>
>
> > D.L.: But if you're watching the show for a detailed explanation of
> > what the numbers mean-and I'm not saying you won't see more of them-
> > then you will be disappointed by the end of season six.
> >
>
> In other words, they started things without knowing how they would end
> them, and the numbers is one thing that was great, but once they had to
> explain the purpose, they were dead in the water.
>
> I have a feeling there are a LOT of questions like this they cop out
> and not answer with that "it will demystify it" crap.
>
And now the numbers debate with Jim Gysin on one side and a bunch of us on
the other can start all over again...
Jason
|
