Re: Bruce Boxleitner joins "Heroes"

In article <o4ednVL1iMp-TLrVnZ2dnUVZ_hudnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
 Michael Bowker <mikeb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> Anim8rFSK wrote:
> > In article <g084fj$r2d$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> >  wdstarr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (William December Starr) wrote:
> > 
> >> In article <ANIM8Rfsk-4766A9.13123508052008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> >> Anim8rFSK <ANIM8Rfsk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> said:
> >>
> >>> In article <482347c6$0$34544$742ec2ed@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> >>> "Dimensional Traveler" <dtravel@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> "Luckily, one of the passengers just happens to have an atomic
> >>>> bomb . . "  *blink, blink* Uh.... *blink* Okay, I know the TSA
> >>>> has been having problems getting their act together but...?
> >>> I'm serious.  I think it's Bruce that's there 'cause he's riding
> >>> heard on an atomic bomb they're shipping on a passenger plane.
> >>> Mercifully, I forget the details.  It's a little bomb.  I think he
> >>> got to carry it on.
> >> Ah, but did it fit in the overhead baggage compartment?
> > 
> > You know, I don't recall, and if you think I'm gonna watch it again to

> > find out, you're out of your mind.
> > 
> > Unless I find an R rated version . . .
> > 
> Even that wouldn't really help.  Well not that much.  This was a bad 
> movie.

Well, yeah, but what if there's an alternate version where the Aztec 
girls are topless all the time like BOUNTY?

-- 
Star Trek 09:

No Shat, No Show.