Féachadóir wrote:
> Scríobh Tim Bruening <tsbrueni@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>:
> >
> >
> >"pbowles@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" wrote:
> >
> >> Onto the Ood, then. This episode has seemingly been constructed
> >> entirely to answer one question arising from the previous story - how
> >> does a slave race evolve? Disappointing then that the answer involves
> >> adding still more implausibility to Ood biology. An external brain I
> >> can buy for the sake of visualisation - chop off this bit and the Ood
> >> become slaves. Of course there's no terribly good reason humans
> >> couldn't lobotomise them internally, but if there's an easily
> >> detachable visible bit to remove it's more accessible to the viewer.
> >> However, the idea that the Ood have a brain they have to carry in one
> >> hand all the time stretches credibility too far, for all that I liked
> >> the imagery of an organic system the 'Persil balls' replaced.
> >
> >Why would the process of natural selection led to a brain that has to
be
> >carried in one hand? Wouldn't Oods that don't have to carry their
brains
> >have a big competative advantage over the brain carrying Ood?
> >
> >When the modified Ood go on a rampage and start killing with their
> >translater balls, why don't the soldiers smash the translator balls?
>
> The external brain was a bit silly, I agree.
>
> >In the year 4126, why are humans still using projectile weapons which
look
> >like 20th century machine guns and shoot bullets? Why aren't they
using
> >lasers or phasers or disintegrators?
>
> In the year 2008, why are people still murdered with knives and
> machetes? Because they still work. Lasers and phasers may be
> expensive. They may be unreliable. They may have high maintenance
> costs. The AK47 was invented in 1947 (hence the name) and still works.
> Good designs survive. I'm reminded of the Stargate episode where Thor
> tells Carter that they'd never have thought of using primitive lead
> projectiles to destroy replicators, even though their more advanced
> weapons were useless against the critters.
>
> >The Oodsphere company packs Ood standing up into big boxes. The Ood
aren't
> >strapped in in any way, meaning that they will get hurt if the box tips
> >over or is dropped. Why aren't these valuable slaves better secured?
> >Also, why aren't there any toilets in the Ood boxes or cages?
>
> Animals are regularly trans****ted on the hoof. Cattle boxes don't have
> toilet facilities either.
Cattle have four feet, so are more stable standing up than the two
footed Ood.
Wouldn't the Oodsphere customers insist that the Ood be well secured for
trans****t? Wouldn't they sue if their Ood slaves arrive dead or
seriously injured?
|
