Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Science Fiction > Written > Re: Right watt ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 15 of 67 Topic 20163 of 22908
Post > Topic >>

Re: Right watt ewe no

by Kurt Busiek <kurt@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 7, 2008 at 09:08 AM

On 2008-02-07 00:26:48 -0800, "Ken from Chicago" 
<kwicker1b_nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> said:

> 
> "Kurt Busiek" <kurt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:2008020619033675249-kurt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On 2008-02-06 16:44:13 -0800, "John" <john@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> said:
>> 
>>> 
>>> "Ken from Chicago" <kwicker1b_nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>> news:XOOdnTuA6tO2qzfanZ2dnUVZ_uWlnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> Are there any sf series where professional writing plays a
>>>> "significant",
>>>> not necessarily dominant or featured, but a good-sized ****tion to be
>>>> noticeable part of the story?
>>>> 
>>>> By "writing" I'm including:
>>>> --The act of writing and / or typing.
>>>> --The working out of stories, outline, plot points, painted corners,
>>>> etc.
>>>> --The editing and reediting and internal critiquing of the story.
>>>> --The publi****ng, selecting of material, the printing of said
material,
>>>> etc.
>>>> --The selling of books, marketing, advertising, book tours, cons,
>>>> junkets,
>>>> etc.
>>>> 
>>>> -- Ken from Chicago
>>>> 
>>>> P.S. I excluded the "researching" because that allows MURDER, SHE
WROTE
>>>> style series, where solving murders becomes "research" for stories,
and
>>>> I
>>>> was interested more in the field of writing itself.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Virtually everything Steven King has written in recent years involves
>>> writers and writing. And his damn car accident.
>> 
>> And much of it's been quite good.
>> 
>> DUMA KEY, for instance, clearly has great whacks of him "writing what
he
>> knows," but it gives the novel a lot of creadibility in the real-world
>> stuff that serves the book well when the spooky supernatural stuff
starts
>> happening.
>> 
>> The fact that I know he's drawing on experience rather than research
>> doesn't make it work less well.
>> 
>> But other than DUMA KEY -- and autobiographical stuff like ON WRITING,
of
>> course -- what's he written based on the car accident?  I don't doubt
>> there's something, but aside from a few references in THE DARK TOWER,
it's
>> not coming to mind.
>> 
>> kdb
>> 
> 
> Kurt, dude, I'm not even a Stephen King fan (thank you, I can make my
own
> nightmares, no need for help) and even I've heard of MISERY.

You think MISERY was written based on his car accident?

Neat trick, considering that it was published over a decade before 
thecar accident.

kdb
 




 67 Posts in Topic:
Right watt ewe no
"Ken from Chicago&qu  2008-02-06 16:35:21 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-06 22:46:54 
Re: Right watt ewe no
tphile <tphile@[EMAIL   2008-02-06 15:06:53 
Re: Right watt ewe no
mimus <tinmimus99@[EMA  2008-02-06 18:23:10 
Re: Right watt ewe no
William George Ferguson &  2008-02-06 16:30:50 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Brenda Clough <clough@  2008-02-06 23:18:23 
Re: Right watt ewe no
phoenix@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-06 23:37:27 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Butch Malahide <fred.g  2008-02-06 16:18:39 
Re: Right watt ewe no
tphile <tphile@[EMAIL   2008-02-06 16:37:50 
Re: Right watt ewe no
dbd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (D  2008-02-06 22:47:57 
Re: Right watt ewe no
"medrith_nuttle@[EMA  2008-02-07 08:31:06 
Re: Right watt ewe no
"John" <john  2008-02-07 11:44:13 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Kurt Busiek <kurt@[EMA  2008-02-06 19:03:36 
Re: Right watt ewe no
"Ken from Chicago&qu  2008-02-07 02:26:48 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Kurt Busiek <kurt@[EMA  2008-02-07 09:08:21 
Re: Right watt ewe no
"Ken from Chicago&qu  2008-02-07 19:19:46 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Lawrence Watt-Evans <l  2008-02-07 12:24:42 
Re: Right watt ewe no
"Dan Goodman" &  2008-02-08 05:40:10 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Konrad Gaertner <kgaer  2008-02-06 20:46:39 
Re: Right watt ewe no
tphile <tphile@[EMAIL   2008-02-06 19:24:54 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Kurt Busiek <kurt@[EMA  2008-02-06 19:32:19 
Re: Right watt ewe no
tphile <tphile@[EMAIL   2008-02-06 21:00:03 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Kurt Busiek <kurt@[EMA  2008-02-06 22:24:43 
Re: Right watt ewe no
"Ken from Chicago&qu  2008-02-07 02:31:48 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-07 06:42:49 
Re: Right watt ewe no
dbd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (D  2008-02-07 04:34:54 
Re: Right watt ewe no
acwheele@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-02-07 20:33:42 
Re: Right watt ewe no
"John" <john  2008-02-08 15:59:53 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Kurt Busiek <kurt@[EMA  2008-02-07 21:11:25 
Re: Right watt ewe no
cgoodin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-11 23:55:43 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Kurt Busiek <kurt@[EMA  2008-02-11 17:29:09 
Re: Right watt ewe no
cgoodin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-14 17:31:34 
Re: Right watt ewe no
ncwaite@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-07 00:41:38 
Re: Right watt ewe no
"artyw2@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-02-07 06:20:33 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Butch Malahide <fred.g  2008-02-07 10:38:01 
Re: Right watt ewe no
goldfarb@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-02-07 23:33:34 
Re: Right watt ewe no
tphile <tphile@[EMAIL   2008-02-08 00:58:27 
Re: Right watt ewe no
nance@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-08 13:26:50 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Kurt Busiek <kurt@[EMA  2008-02-08 08:41:40 
Re: Right watt ewe no
nance@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-08 16:59:43 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Thomas Lindgren <*****  2008-02-09 01:46:07 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Kurt Busiek <kurt@[EMA  2008-02-08 18:53:11 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Robert Carnegie <rja.c  2008-02-08 08:22:58 
Re: Right watt ewe no
wdstarr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-08 16:39:15 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Robert Carnegie <rja.c  2008-02-11 03:10:26 
Re: Right watt ewe no
wdstarr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-11 22:01:03 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Butch Malahide <fred.g  2008-02-11 05:17:00 
Re: Right watt ewe no
David Cowie <me@[EMAIL  2008-02-11 15:01:35 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Kurt Busiek <kurt@[EMA  2008-02-11 08:47:12 
Re: Right watt ewe no
wdstarr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-11 21:54:38 
Re: Right watt ewe no
tphile <tphile@[EMAIL   2008-02-11 09:50:30 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Aaron Denney <wnoise@[  2008-02-11 18:21:07 
Re: Right watt ewe no
"John" <john  2008-02-12 11:33:14 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Mark_Reichert@[EMAIL PROT  2008-02-11 11:19:43 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Mark_Reichert@[EMAIL PROT  2008-02-11 11:22:26 
Re: Right watt ewe no
"Ken from Chicago&qu  2008-02-11 22:12:35 
Re: Right watt ewe no
tphile <tphile@[EMAIL   2008-02-11 16:49:48 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Robert Carnegie <rja.c  2008-02-12 01:51:53 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Jerry Brown <jerry@[EM  2008-02-12 18:40:46 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Robert Carnegie <rja.c  2008-02-12 01:56:15 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Sea Wasp <seawaspObvio  2008-02-12 08:07:17 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Kurt Busiek <kurt@[EMA  2008-02-12 08:42:09 
Re: Right watt ewe no
cgoodin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-12 18:21:48 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-12 19:17:51 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Kurt Busiek <kurt@[EMA  2008-02-12 08:39:41 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Robert Carnegie <rja.c  2008-02-13 01:40:54 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Robert Carnegie <rja.c  2008-02-13 02:03:36 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Nov 22 9:54:53 CST 2008.