Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Science Fiction > Written > Re: Right watt ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 29 of 67 Topic 20163 of 23014
Post > Topic >>

Re: Right watt ewe no

by Kurt Busiek <kurt@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 7, 2008 at 09:11 PM

On 2008-02-07 17:33:42 -0800, acwheele@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Andrew Wheeler) said:

> tphile <tphile@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> 
>> I am gonna have to wait for the movie then.
>> In spite of being a lifelong book reader I have a real problem with
>> Kings
>> I had read some of his earlier works but Tommyknockers just ended it
>> for me
>> and I haven't been able to get thru another King story since.  For me
>> taking ten
>> pages to describe what other great writers could write in 10
>> paragraphs is not good
>> storytelling.  Its like trying to run thru mud.
>> I even started Gunslinger about a dozen times over the years but just
>> lost interest
>> I suppose thats happened to most everyone here at some point with some
>> book or author
> 
> I haven't read King myself in years, so I'm not urging you to run right
> out and grab everything you missed, but _Tommyknockers_ is generally
> considered his worst book, and even King himself doesn't remember
> writing it. (That was during the coke years.)
> 
> It's also a good twenty years ago now; he's had as much (or more) of a
> career *since* _Tommyknockers_ that he did before it.
> 
> I'm not sure if you've tried to read anything he's written more recently
> -- if so, then he's clearly not for you. But I don't think anyone
> considers _Tommyknockers_ typical.
> 
> (For myself, it was _It_ that knocked me off the King habit.)

For me, his very first story collection knocked me off, and it was the 
first thing I read.  But I wound up reading MISERY because there was 
nothing else to read, and that yanked me back on, and I wound up 
catching up on everything.

I enjoyed TOMMYKNOCKERS, but I might have had a similar reaction to the 
general one if I'd read it as a new book -- knowing that he went on to 
better things changes one's perspective.

I enjoyed IT, too, but I'm not alone in that.

I didn't enjoy PET SEMATARY, CHRISTINE or ROSE MADDER much, along with 
not caring for the main plot of CUJO.

But I've liked most of what he's done from MISERY on, and the more 
reflective novels, particularly BAG OF BONES, LISEY'S STORY, DUMA KEY 
and the character-interplay stuff in DREAMCATCHER ave some very 
absorbing, very strong writing to them.

I think, as he's gotten past the need to be commercial (since he's 
gonna sell zillions no matter what), he's developed a real flair for 
rich, textured wordsmithing, and it makes the books a real pleasure to 
spend time with.

His son Joe's first novel, HEART-SHAPED BOX (by "Joe Hill") is a 
powerful horror novel that feels a lot like early King, but with a very 
modern sensibility.

kdb
 




 67 Posts in Topic:
Right watt ewe no
"Ken from Chicago&qu  2008-02-06 16:35:21 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-06 22:46:54 
Re: Right watt ewe no
tphile <tphile@[EMAIL   2008-02-06 15:06:53 
Re: Right watt ewe no
mimus <tinmimus99@[EMA  2008-02-06 18:23:10 
Re: Right watt ewe no
William George Ferguson &  2008-02-06 16:30:50 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Brenda Clough <clough@  2008-02-06 23:18:23 
Re: Right watt ewe no
phoenix@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-06 23:37:27 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Butch Malahide <fred.g  2008-02-06 16:18:39 
Re: Right watt ewe no
tphile <tphile@[EMAIL   2008-02-06 16:37:50 
Re: Right watt ewe no
dbd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (D  2008-02-06 22:47:57 
Re: Right watt ewe no
"medrith_nuttle@[EMA  2008-02-07 08:31:06 
Re: Right watt ewe no
"John" <john  2008-02-07 11:44:13 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Kurt Busiek <kurt@[EMA  2008-02-06 19:03:36 
Re: Right watt ewe no
"Ken from Chicago&qu  2008-02-07 02:26:48 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Kurt Busiek <kurt@[EMA  2008-02-07 09:08:21 
Re: Right watt ewe no
"Ken from Chicago&qu  2008-02-07 19:19:46 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Lawrence Watt-Evans <l  2008-02-07 12:24:42 
Re: Right watt ewe no
"Dan Goodman" &  2008-02-08 05:40:10 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Konrad Gaertner <kgaer  2008-02-06 20:46:39 
Re: Right watt ewe no
tphile <tphile@[EMAIL   2008-02-06 19:24:54 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Kurt Busiek <kurt@[EMA  2008-02-06 19:32:19 
Re: Right watt ewe no
tphile <tphile@[EMAIL   2008-02-06 21:00:03 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Kurt Busiek <kurt@[EMA  2008-02-06 22:24:43 
Re: Right watt ewe no
"Ken from Chicago&qu  2008-02-07 02:31:48 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-07 06:42:49 
Re: Right watt ewe no
dbd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (D  2008-02-07 04:34:54 
Re: Right watt ewe no
acwheele@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-02-07 20:33:42 
Re: Right watt ewe no
"John" <john  2008-02-08 15:59:53 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Kurt Busiek <kurt@[EMA  2008-02-07 21:11:25 
Re: Right watt ewe no
cgoodin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-11 23:55:43 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Kurt Busiek <kurt@[EMA  2008-02-11 17:29:09 
Re: Right watt ewe no
cgoodin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-14 17:31:34 
Re: Right watt ewe no
ncwaite@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-07 00:41:38 
Re: Right watt ewe no
"artyw2@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-02-07 06:20:33 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Butch Malahide <fred.g  2008-02-07 10:38:01 
Re: Right watt ewe no
goldfarb@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-02-07 23:33:34 
Re: Right watt ewe no
tphile <tphile@[EMAIL   2008-02-08 00:58:27 
Re: Right watt ewe no
nance@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-08 13:26:50 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Kurt Busiek <kurt@[EMA  2008-02-08 08:41:40 
Re: Right watt ewe no
nance@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-08 16:59:43 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Thomas Lindgren <*****  2008-02-09 01:46:07 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Kurt Busiek <kurt@[EMA  2008-02-08 18:53:11 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Robert Carnegie <rja.c  2008-02-08 08:22:58 
Re: Right watt ewe no
wdstarr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-08 16:39:15 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Robert Carnegie <rja.c  2008-02-11 03:10:26 
Re: Right watt ewe no
wdstarr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-11 22:01:03 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Butch Malahide <fred.g  2008-02-11 05:17:00 
Re: Right watt ewe no
David Cowie <me@[EMAIL  2008-02-11 15:01:35 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Kurt Busiek <kurt@[EMA  2008-02-11 08:47:12 
Re: Right watt ewe no
wdstarr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-11 21:54:38 
Re: Right watt ewe no
tphile <tphile@[EMAIL   2008-02-11 09:50:30 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Aaron Denney <wnoise@[  2008-02-11 18:21:07 
Re: Right watt ewe no
"John" <john  2008-02-12 11:33:14 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Mark_Reichert@[EMAIL PROT  2008-02-11 11:19:43 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Mark_Reichert@[EMAIL PROT  2008-02-11 11:22:26 
Re: Right watt ewe no
"Ken from Chicago&qu  2008-02-11 22:12:35 
Re: Right watt ewe no
tphile <tphile@[EMAIL   2008-02-11 16:49:48 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Robert Carnegie <rja.c  2008-02-12 01:51:53 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Jerry Brown <jerry@[EM  2008-02-12 18:40:46 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Robert Carnegie <rja.c  2008-02-12 01:56:15 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Sea Wasp <seawaspObvio  2008-02-12 08:07:17 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Kurt Busiek <kurt@[EMA  2008-02-12 08:42:09 
Re: Right watt ewe no
cgoodin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-12 18:21:48 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-12 19:17:51 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Kurt Busiek <kurt@[EMA  2008-02-12 08:39:41 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Robert Carnegie <rja.c  2008-02-13 01:40:54 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Robert Carnegie <rja.c  2008-02-13 02:03:36 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Wed Dec 3 18:36:24 CST 2008.