Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Science Fiction > Written > Re: Right watt ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 43 of 67 Topic 20163 of 23014
Post > Topic >>

Re: Right watt ewe no

by Robert Carnegie <rja.carnegie@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 8, 2008 at 08:22 AM

On 6 Feb, 22:35, "Ken from Chicago" <kwicker1b_nos...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> Are there any sf series where professional writing plays a
"significant",
> not necessarily dominant or featured, but a good-sized ****tion to be
> noticeable part of the story?
>
> By "writing" I'm including:
> --The act of writing and / or typing.
> --The working out of stories, outline, plot points, painted corners,
etc.
> --The editing and reediting and internal critiquing of the story.
> --The publi****ng, selecting of material, the printing of said material,
etc.
> --The selling of books, marketing, advertising, book tours, cons,
junkets,
> etc.
>
> -- Ken from Chicago
>
> P.S. I excluded the "researching" because that allows MURDER, SHE WROTE
> style series, where solving murders becomes "research" for stories, and
I
> was interested more in the field of writing itself.

The condition that it's an SF /series/ is tough to meet.  There's the
"Incompleat Enchanter" stories, where not modern professional writing
but enumerating the logical premises of a legend-cycle (such as the
dramatic structure of Norse myths or the Faerie Queen) constitute a
magical spell that tele****ts you into that world.  In that there's
more than one episode of that, it's a series.

And in _Star Trek: Deep Space Nine_, Jake Sisko grows up a fiction
writer - I think season four includes both the episode where his old-
age famous-writer self remembers the technobabble discontainment that
swallowed up his father (retroactively undone, I think), /and/ the one
where a psychic-vampire muse lady feeds on his writer mojo.

Oh, and the _U.F.O._ series is set in a film studio with a secret base
rather pointlessly underneath it.  The secret commander poses as, /
is/, the studio head, and presumably is involved with scripts as well
as everything else.
 




 67 Posts in Topic:
Right watt ewe no
"Ken from Chicago&qu  2008-02-06 16:35:21 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-06 22:46:54 
Re: Right watt ewe no
tphile <tphile@[EMAIL   2008-02-06 15:06:53 
Re: Right watt ewe no
mimus <tinmimus99@[EMA  2008-02-06 18:23:10 
Re: Right watt ewe no
William George Ferguson &  2008-02-06 16:30:50 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Brenda Clough <clough@  2008-02-06 23:18:23 
Re: Right watt ewe no
phoenix@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-06 23:37:27 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Butch Malahide <fred.g  2008-02-06 16:18:39 
Re: Right watt ewe no
tphile <tphile@[EMAIL   2008-02-06 16:37:50 
Re: Right watt ewe no
dbd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (D  2008-02-06 22:47:57 
Re: Right watt ewe no
"medrith_nuttle@[EMA  2008-02-07 08:31:06 
Re: Right watt ewe no
"John" <john  2008-02-07 11:44:13 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Kurt Busiek <kurt@[EMA  2008-02-06 19:03:36 
Re: Right watt ewe no
"Ken from Chicago&qu  2008-02-07 02:26:48 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Kurt Busiek <kurt@[EMA  2008-02-07 09:08:21 
Re: Right watt ewe no
"Ken from Chicago&qu  2008-02-07 19:19:46 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Lawrence Watt-Evans <l  2008-02-07 12:24:42 
Re: Right watt ewe no
"Dan Goodman" &  2008-02-08 05:40:10 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Konrad Gaertner <kgaer  2008-02-06 20:46:39 
Re: Right watt ewe no
tphile <tphile@[EMAIL   2008-02-06 19:24:54 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Kurt Busiek <kurt@[EMA  2008-02-06 19:32:19 
Re: Right watt ewe no
tphile <tphile@[EMAIL   2008-02-06 21:00:03 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Kurt Busiek <kurt@[EMA  2008-02-06 22:24:43 
Re: Right watt ewe no
"Ken from Chicago&qu  2008-02-07 02:31:48 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-07 06:42:49 
Re: Right watt ewe no
dbd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (D  2008-02-07 04:34:54 
Re: Right watt ewe no
acwheele@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-02-07 20:33:42 
Re: Right watt ewe no
"John" <john  2008-02-08 15:59:53 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Kurt Busiek <kurt@[EMA  2008-02-07 21:11:25 
Re: Right watt ewe no
cgoodin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-11 23:55:43 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Kurt Busiek <kurt@[EMA  2008-02-11 17:29:09 
Re: Right watt ewe no
cgoodin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-14 17:31:34 
Re: Right watt ewe no
ncwaite@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-07 00:41:38 
Re: Right watt ewe no
"artyw2@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-02-07 06:20:33 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Butch Malahide <fred.g  2008-02-07 10:38:01 
Re: Right watt ewe no
goldfarb@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-02-07 23:33:34 
Re: Right watt ewe no
tphile <tphile@[EMAIL   2008-02-08 00:58:27 
Re: Right watt ewe no
nance@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-08 13:26:50 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Kurt Busiek <kurt@[EMA  2008-02-08 08:41:40 
Re: Right watt ewe no
nance@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-08 16:59:43 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Thomas Lindgren <*****  2008-02-09 01:46:07 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Kurt Busiek <kurt@[EMA  2008-02-08 18:53:11 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Robert Carnegie <rja.c  2008-02-08 08:22:58 
Re: Right watt ewe no
wdstarr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-08 16:39:15 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Robert Carnegie <rja.c  2008-02-11 03:10:26 
Re: Right watt ewe no
wdstarr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-11 22:01:03 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Butch Malahide <fred.g  2008-02-11 05:17:00 
Re: Right watt ewe no
David Cowie <me@[EMAIL  2008-02-11 15:01:35 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Kurt Busiek <kurt@[EMA  2008-02-11 08:47:12 
Re: Right watt ewe no
wdstarr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-11 21:54:38 
Re: Right watt ewe no
tphile <tphile@[EMAIL   2008-02-11 09:50:30 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Aaron Denney <wnoise@[  2008-02-11 18:21:07 
Re: Right watt ewe no
"John" <john  2008-02-12 11:33:14 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Mark_Reichert@[EMAIL PROT  2008-02-11 11:19:43 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Mark_Reichert@[EMAIL PROT  2008-02-11 11:22:26 
Re: Right watt ewe no
"Ken from Chicago&qu  2008-02-11 22:12:35 
Re: Right watt ewe no
tphile <tphile@[EMAIL   2008-02-11 16:49:48 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Robert Carnegie <rja.c  2008-02-12 01:51:53 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Jerry Brown <jerry@[EM  2008-02-12 18:40:46 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Robert Carnegie <rja.c  2008-02-12 01:56:15 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Sea Wasp <seawaspObvio  2008-02-12 08:07:17 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Kurt Busiek <kurt@[EMA  2008-02-12 08:42:09 
Re: Right watt ewe no
cgoodin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-12 18:21:48 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-12 19:17:51 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Kurt Busiek <kurt@[EMA  2008-02-12 08:39:41 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Robert Carnegie <rja.c  2008-02-13 01:40:54 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Robert Carnegie <rja.c  2008-02-13 02:03:36 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Wed Dec 3 18:28:59 CST 2008.