Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Science Fiction > Written > Re: Right watt ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 45 of 67 Topic 20163 of 23014
Post > Topic >>

Re: Right watt ewe no

by Robert Carnegie <rja.carnegie@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 11, 2008 at 03:10 AM

On 8 Feb, 21:39, wdst...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (William December Starr) wrote:
> In article
<502dd38c-1022-47fe-a49d-4e161421d...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> Robert Carnegie <rja.carne...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> said:
> > Oh, and the _U.F.O._ series is set in a film studio with a secret
> > base rather pointlessly underneath it. =A0The secret commander poses
> > as, / is/, the studio head, and presumably is involved with
> > scripts as well as everything else.
>
> It wasn't pointless -- it was a "hide in plain sight" operation in
> which they could move uniformed/spacesuited/whatever personnel,
> bizarre equipment, weaponry and vehicles, and even pieces of alien
> spacecraft around in the open without anyone noticing.

Hmm, is this actually explained?  The ITV4 channel has just wound its
twice-weekly re-runs back to the start, so in three months' time I
should know.  Although I couldn't sit through "Confetti Check A.-
O.K.", in which Commander Straker's studio is constructed over years
while his marriage disintegrates.

I think a studio that launched actual submarines and moon rockets
would be conspicuous even in far-future 1980, and it's not as though
there aren't real military sites around with a secret status.  Maybe
it just seemed like a good idea to some rather overenthusiastic
security staff - apparently when they say "I could tell you but then
I'd have to kill you" it is not a joke - and of course to Gerry and
Sylvia Anderson, along with short skirts, wigs for everyone, and
driving on the right.  Secret defence organisations are more fun, and
they got Avengers-style novelty locations out of it as well, very
cheaply too since, of course, they could simply use the actual studio
where they were filming the programme, as the fictional studio where
it was supposedly set.
 




 67 Posts in Topic:
Right watt ewe no
"Ken from Chicago&qu  2008-02-06 16:35:21 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-06 22:46:54 
Re: Right watt ewe no
tphile <tphile@[EMAIL   2008-02-06 15:06:53 
Re: Right watt ewe no
mimus <tinmimus99@[EMA  2008-02-06 18:23:10 
Re: Right watt ewe no
William George Ferguson &  2008-02-06 16:30:50 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Brenda Clough <clough@  2008-02-06 23:18:23 
Re: Right watt ewe no
phoenix@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-06 23:37:27 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Butch Malahide <fred.g  2008-02-06 16:18:39 
Re: Right watt ewe no
tphile <tphile@[EMAIL   2008-02-06 16:37:50 
Re: Right watt ewe no
dbd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (D  2008-02-06 22:47:57 
Re: Right watt ewe no
"medrith_nuttle@[EMA  2008-02-07 08:31:06 
Re: Right watt ewe no
"John" <john  2008-02-07 11:44:13 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Kurt Busiek <kurt@[EMA  2008-02-06 19:03:36 
Re: Right watt ewe no
"Ken from Chicago&qu  2008-02-07 02:26:48 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Kurt Busiek <kurt@[EMA  2008-02-07 09:08:21 
Re: Right watt ewe no
"Ken from Chicago&qu  2008-02-07 19:19:46 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Lawrence Watt-Evans <l  2008-02-07 12:24:42 
Re: Right watt ewe no
"Dan Goodman" &  2008-02-08 05:40:10 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Konrad Gaertner <kgaer  2008-02-06 20:46:39 
Re: Right watt ewe no
tphile <tphile@[EMAIL   2008-02-06 19:24:54 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Kurt Busiek <kurt@[EMA  2008-02-06 19:32:19 
Re: Right watt ewe no
tphile <tphile@[EMAIL   2008-02-06 21:00:03 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Kurt Busiek <kurt@[EMA  2008-02-06 22:24:43 
Re: Right watt ewe no
"Ken from Chicago&qu  2008-02-07 02:31:48 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-07 06:42:49 
Re: Right watt ewe no
dbd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (D  2008-02-07 04:34:54 
Re: Right watt ewe no
acwheele@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-02-07 20:33:42 
Re: Right watt ewe no
"John" <john  2008-02-08 15:59:53 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Kurt Busiek <kurt@[EMA  2008-02-07 21:11:25 
Re: Right watt ewe no
cgoodin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-11 23:55:43 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Kurt Busiek <kurt@[EMA  2008-02-11 17:29:09 
Re: Right watt ewe no
cgoodin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-14 17:31:34 
Re: Right watt ewe no
ncwaite@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-07 00:41:38 
Re: Right watt ewe no
"artyw2@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-02-07 06:20:33 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Butch Malahide <fred.g  2008-02-07 10:38:01 
Re: Right watt ewe no
goldfarb@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-02-07 23:33:34 
Re: Right watt ewe no
tphile <tphile@[EMAIL   2008-02-08 00:58:27 
Re: Right watt ewe no
nance@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-08 13:26:50 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Kurt Busiek <kurt@[EMA  2008-02-08 08:41:40 
Re: Right watt ewe no
nance@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-08 16:59:43 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Thomas Lindgren <*****  2008-02-09 01:46:07 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Kurt Busiek <kurt@[EMA  2008-02-08 18:53:11 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Robert Carnegie <rja.c  2008-02-08 08:22:58 
Re: Right watt ewe no
wdstarr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-08 16:39:15 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Robert Carnegie <rja.c  2008-02-11 03:10:26 
Re: Right watt ewe no
wdstarr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-11 22:01:03 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Butch Malahide <fred.g  2008-02-11 05:17:00 
Re: Right watt ewe no
David Cowie <me@[EMAIL  2008-02-11 15:01:35 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Kurt Busiek <kurt@[EMA  2008-02-11 08:47:12 
Re: Right watt ewe no
wdstarr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-11 21:54:38 
Re: Right watt ewe no
tphile <tphile@[EMAIL   2008-02-11 09:50:30 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Aaron Denney <wnoise@[  2008-02-11 18:21:07 
Re: Right watt ewe no
"John" <john  2008-02-12 11:33:14 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Mark_Reichert@[EMAIL PROT  2008-02-11 11:19:43 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Mark_Reichert@[EMAIL PROT  2008-02-11 11:22:26 
Re: Right watt ewe no
"Ken from Chicago&qu  2008-02-11 22:12:35 
Re: Right watt ewe no
tphile <tphile@[EMAIL   2008-02-11 16:49:48 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Robert Carnegie <rja.c  2008-02-12 01:51:53 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Jerry Brown <jerry@[EM  2008-02-12 18:40:46 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Robert Carnegie <rja.c  2008-02-12 01:56:15 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Sea Wasp <seawaspObvio  2008-02-12 08:07:17 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Kurt Busiek <kurt@[EMA  2008-02-12 08:42:09 
Re: Right watt ewe no
cgoodin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-12 18:21:48 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-12 19:17:51 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Kurt Busiek <kurt@[EMA  2008-02-12 08:39:41 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Robert Carnegie <rja.c  2008-02-13 01:40:54 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Robert Carnegie <rja.c  2008-02-13 02:03:36 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Wed Dec 3 17:45:39 CST 2008.