Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Science Fiction > Written > Re: Right watt ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 59 of 67 Topic 20163 of 23003
Post > Topic >>

Re: Right watt ewe no

by Jerry Brown <jerry@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 12, 2008 at 06:40 PM

On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 01:51:53 -0800 (PST), Robert Carnegie
<rja.carnegie@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>On 12 Feb, 03:01, wdst...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (William December Starr) wrote:
>> In article
<6e4048a4-5c3f-457f-9b9f-aba7115ae...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>> Robert Carnegie <rja.carne...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> said:
>>
>> > On 8 Feb, 21:39, wdst...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (William December Starr) wrote:
>> >> Robert Carnegie <rja.carne...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> said:
>>
>> >>> Oh, and the _U.F.O._ series is set in a film studio with a
>> >>> secret base rather pointlessly underneath it. The secret
>> >>> commander poses as, / is/, the studio head, and presumably is
>> >>> involved with scripts as well as everything else.
>>
>> >> It wasn't pointless -- it was a "hide in plain sight" operation in
>> >> which they could move uniformed/spacesuited/whatever personnel,
>> >> bizarre equipment, weaponry and vehicles, and even pieces of alien
>> >> spacecraft around in the open without anyone noticing.
>>
>> > Hmm, is this actually explained?
>>
>> I _think_ so.  Mind you, it's been a few decades since I saw the show.
>
>I am now looking out for an expository scene where Straker says
>something like, "You know - he's the bonehead who had the brilliant
>idea to put our secret base under a film studio.  He retired on
>medical grounds after that."  "And he's been taken by the Aliens?"
>"Oh, it could be worse, Alec.  They could bring hm back."
>
>(Yes, that's swiped from _Red Dwarf_.)
>
>> > I think a studio that launched actual submarines and moon rockets
>> > would be conspicuous even in far-future 1980, and it's not as
>> > though there aren't real military sites around with a secret
>> > status.
>>
>> I don't think they did any launches from the studio grounds.
>
>Then the point was? ...  oh, I'll just watch the show.  The girls are
>terrific, except for the wigs.

We did occasionally get to see the moonbase girls without their purple
wigs; Gay Ellis in "Close-Up" and Nina Barry in "Sub-Smash" and
"Confetti Check A-OK". Can't recall if we ever did so for Joan
Harrington.

ISTR a rather dubious explanation for the wigs as being some sort of
protection against cosmic rays to the brain, although what this
implies about the men on moonbase (who didn't wear them) doesn't bear
thinking about.

Anyway, the best of the UFO girls (IMHO) was the one played by Ayshea
Brough (Lt Johnson?), and, being earth-based, she didn't wear one of
those wigs.

Jerry Brown
-- 
A cat may look at a king
(but probably won't bother)

<http://www.jwbrown.co.uk>
 




 67 Posts in Topic:
Right watt ewe no
"Ken from Chicago&qu  2008-02-06 16:35:21 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-06 22:46:54 
Re: Right watt ewe no
tphile <tphile@[EMAIL   2008-02-06 15:06:53 
Re: Right watt ewe no
mimus <tinmimus99@[EMA  2008-02-06 18:23:10 
Re: Right watt ewe no
William George Ferguson &  2008-02-06 16:30:50 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Brenda Clough <clough@  2008-02-06 23:18:23 
Re: Right watt ewe no
phoenix@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-06 23:37:27 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Butch Malahide <fred.g  2008-02-06 16:18:39 
Re: Right watt ewe no
tphile <tphile@[EMAIL   2008-02-06 16:37:50 
Re: Right watt ewe no
dbd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (D  2008-02-06 22:47:57 
Re: Right watt ewe no
"medrith_nuttle@[EMA  2008-02-07 08:31:06 
Re: Right watt ewe no
"John" <john  2008-02-07 11:44:13 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Kurt Busiek <kurt@[EMA  2008-02-06 19:03:36 
Re: Right watt ewe no
"Ken from Chicago&qu  2008-02-07 02:26:48 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Kurt Busiek <kurt@[EMA  2008-02-07 09:08:21 
Re: Right watt ewe no
"Ken from Chicago&qu  2008-02-07 19:19:46 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Lawrence Watt-Evans <l  2008-02-07 12:24:42 
Re: Right watt ewe no
"Dan Goodman" &  2008-02-08 05:40:10 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Konrad Gaertner <kgaer  2008-02-06 20:46:39 
Re: Right watt ewe no
tphile <tphile@[EMAIL   2008-02-06 19:24:54 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Kurt Busiek <kurt@[EMA  2008-02-06 19:32:19 
Re: Right watt ewe no
tphile <tphile@[EMAIL   2008-02-06 21:00:03 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Kurt Busiek <kurt@[EMA  2008-02-06 22:24:43 
Re: Right watt ewe no
"Ken from Chicago&qu  2008-02-07 02:31:48 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-07 06:42:49 
Re: Right watt ewe no
dbd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (D  2008-02-07 04:34:54 
Re: Right watt ewe no
acwheele@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-02-07 20:33:42 
Re: Right watt ewe no
"John" <john  2008-02-08 15:59:53 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Kurt Busiek <kurt@[EMA  2008-02-07 21:11:25 
Re: Right watt ewe no
cgoodin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-11 23:55:43 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Kurt Busiek <kurt@[EMA  2008-02-11 17:29:09 
Re: Right watt ewe no
cgoodin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-14 17:31:34 
Re: Right watt ewe no
ncwaite@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-07 00:41:38 
Re: Right watt ewe no
"artyw2@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-02-07 06:20:33 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Butch Malahide <fred.g  2008-02-07 10:38:01 
Re: Right watt ewe no
goldfarb@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-02-07 23:33:34 
Re: Right watt ewe no
tphile <tphile@[EMAIL   2008-02-08 00:58:27 
Re: Right watt ewe no
nance@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-08 13:26:50 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Kurt Busiek <kurt@[EMA  2008-02-08 08:41:40 
Re: Right watt ewe no
nance@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-08 16:59:43 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Thomas Lindgren <*****  2008-02-09 01:46:07 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Kurt Busiek <kurt@[EMA  2008-02-08 18:53:11 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Robert Carnegie <rja.c  2008-02-08 08:22:58 
Re: Right watt ewe no
wdstarr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-08 16:39:15 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Robert Carnegie <rja.c  2008-02-11 03:10:26 
Re: Right watt ewe no
wdstarr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-11 22:01:03 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Butch Malahide <fred.g  2008-02-11 05:17:00 
Re: Right watt ewe no
David Cowie <me@[EMAIL  2008-02-11 15:01:35 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Kurt Busiek <kurt@[EMA  2008-02-11 08:47:12 
Re: Right watt ewe no
wdstarr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-11 21:54:38 
Re: Right watt ewe no
tphile <tphile@[EMAIL   2008-02-11 09:50:30 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Aaron Denney <wnoise@[  2008-02-11 18:21:07 
Re: Right watt ewe no
"John" <john  2008-02-12 11:33:14 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Mark_Reichert@[EMAIL PROT  2008-02-11 11:19:43 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Mark_Reichert@[EMAIL PROT  2008-02-11 11:22:26 
Re: Right watt ewe no
"Ken from Chicago&qu  2008-02-11 22:12:35 
Re: Right watt ewe no
tphile <tphile@[EMAIL   2008-02-11 16:49:48 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Robert Carnegie <rja.c  2008-02-12 01:51:53 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Jerry Brown <jerry@[EM  2008-02-12 18:40:46 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Robert Carnegie <rja.c  2008-02-12 01:56:15 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Sea Wasp <seawaspObvio  2008-02-12 08:07:17 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Kurt Busiek <kurt@[EMA  2008-02-12 08:42:09 
Re: Right watt ewe no
cgoodin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-12 18:21:48 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-12 19:17:51 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Kurt Busiek <kurt@[EMA  2008-02-12 08:39:41 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Robert Carnegie <rja.c  2008-02-13 01:40:54 
Re: Right watt ewe no
Robert Carnegie <rja.c  2008-02-13 02:03:36 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Mon Dec 1 23:05:22 CST 2008.