Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Science Fiction > Written > Re: Not always ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 28 of 802 Topic 20287 of 22908
Post > Topic >>

Re: Not always joking, it seems

by Mark_Reichert@[EMAIL PROTECTED] Feb 21, 2008 at 12:01 PM

On Feb 20, 12:24=A0pm, David Friedman <d...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> In article <fphovk$8i...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> =A0Matthias Warkus <War...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > John Schilling schrieb:
> > > On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 12:20:54 +0100, Matthias Warkus
> > > <War...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > >> Karl M. Syring schrieb:
> > >>> On 16 Feb., 09:16, Matthias Warkus
<War...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>> Willie.Moo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 schrieb:
>
> > >>>>> Today, we do not hear pundits speak of too cheap to meter -
instea=
d we
> > >>>>> hear pundits say this is the first generation of Americans that
wi=
ll
> > >>>>> not live better than their parents.
> > >>>> Note this has been said about the last two generations already.
> > >>>> "Generation X" came out in 1989, after all.
> > >>> I admit, It was true in 1989 so it is the second generation
getting
> > >>> screwed.
> > >> It seems that you can torture the statistics any way you like on
this=

> > >> issue. Conventional wisdom has it that US real wages have been more
o=
r
> > >> less declinining since the 1960s, without ever really picking up in
> > >> between, but the German Federation of Labour Unions, of all things,
> > >> maintains they have gone up 30.6 % between 1980 and 2000.
>
> > >> Has there been a gradient in the US HDI over those last 20 years?
>
> > > That depends on whether the 'D' in "HDI" stands for "disposable"
> > > (i.e. after taxes) or "discretionary" (i.e. after necessities).
>
> > I wasn't aware that HDI was such a versatile TLA ... what I meant to
> > mean was Human Development Index. Sorry.
>
> Interesting--not a measure I was familiar with.
>
> I wonder what the reason was for including income as log income,
> everything else as the value itself. As a way of reflecting declining
> marginal utility of income? Or as a way of lowering the figure for high
> income countries?
>
> So far as your question is concerned ... =A0. I don't have a source for
> the HDI for the U.S. over time. But real income per capita has been
> going up, life expectancy has been going up.

Debt has been going up.....

Amazing what can be hidden if you focus on the asset side and ignore
the liabilities.

But then people who ignore everything not immediately pertinant to
themselves can create all sorts of fantasies about how great the world
is.
 




 802 Posts in Topic:
Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-15 02:20:10 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Wim Lewis <wiml@[EMAIL  2008-02-15 02:55:50 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-14 19:49:12 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Sean O'Hara <seanohara  2008-02-15 02:21:37 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-14 23:38:53 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Sean O'Hara <seanohara  2008-02-15 11:33:39 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-15 11:19:05 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-15 11:16:59 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Petrea Mitchell <pravn  2008-02-17 18:46:47 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-17 13:19:56 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-17 21:24:02 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-18 01:03:01 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-15 05:07:21 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL  2008-02-15 17:12:15 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"louann_m@[EMAIL PRO  2008-02-19 08:42:17 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-19 12:28:09 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
cgoodin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-19 20:16:20 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
lathamr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-19 20:38:14 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
dbd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (D  2008-02-19 22:52:31 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-19 19:42:01 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
wdstarr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-19 20:31:59 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
John Schilling <schill  2008-02-20 18:33:10 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-20 21:48:47 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Jim Lovejoy <nospam@[E  2008-02-20 23:34:43 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-21 06:02:42 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mzenier@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-21 18:56:24 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
jamesd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-20 18:46:00 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Mark_Reichert@[EMAIL PROT  2008-02-21 12:01:14 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-21 12:35:04 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Willie.Mookie@[EMAIL PROT  2008-02-15 13:03:31 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-15 13:12:43 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
dbd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (D  2008-02-15 18:11:20 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Dimensional Travele  2008-02-15 17:33:16 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Edward McArdle <mcardl  2008-02-16 11:00:30 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
throopw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-19 07:16:04 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-19 17:26:52 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-16 00:14:21 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Sean O'Hara <seanohara  2008-02-15 21:37:50 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-15 18:59:43 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-02-16 05:50:33 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
dbd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (D  2008-02-16 03:37:20 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Bill Snyder <bsnyder@[  2008-02-16 04:52:10 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-16 18:24:21 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-02-16 22:32:22 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-02-17 18:13:42 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Sean O'Hara <seanohara  2008-02-16 16:37:50 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-16 14:17:22 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-02-16 05:49:55 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Marcus L. Rowland&q  2008-02-19 08:35:43 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-19 12:27:26 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-19 12:15:09 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Dimensional Travele  2008-02-19 20:36:42 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
William Hyde <wthyde19  2008-02-19 09:46:25 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Howard Brazee <pbrazee  2008-02-19 18:35:45 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
wdstarr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-19 20:49:36 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
lathamr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-21 13:50:48 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL  2008-02-21 19:09:20 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David McMillan <spamtr  2008-02-23 20:45:26 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"pullo" <pul  2008-02-24 04:02:10 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"AJ" <tortur  2008-02-24 05:32:26 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"pullo" <pul  2008-02-24 06:13:59 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Harmon <source@[  2008-02-24 18:03:43 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"pullo" <pul  2008-02-25 06:37:58 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David McMillan <spamtr  2008-02-25 15:12:01 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Jay E. Morris"  2008-02-25 03:43:30 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"pullo" <pul  2008-02-25 06:40:26 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Jay E. Morris"  2008-02-26 01:24:14 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"pullo" <pul  2008-02-26 19:51:25 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Jay E. Morris"  2008-02-28 01:48:08 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"pullo" <pul  2008-02-27 21:01:36 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Jay E. Morris"  2008-03-01 21:04:11 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-02 21:04:28 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"pullo" <pul  2008-03-02 22:45:34 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David McMillan <spamtr  2008-02-25 15:15:02 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David McMillan <spamtr  2008-02-25 14:52:11 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"pullo" <pul  2008-02-26 20:09:10 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-24 18:50:44 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Marcus L. Rowland&q  2008-02-19 22:40:52 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
wdstarr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-19 20:23:49 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-19 22:38:28 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-19 19:44:36 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-19 23:44:43 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL  2008-02-20 16:38:56 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-19 22:37:43 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Robert Sneddon <fred@[  2008-02-20 20:37:22 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
lathamr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-21 13:35:53 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-21 18:58:30 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-22 00:05:37 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
dbd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (D  2008-02-21 20:10:16 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-21 16:53:59 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Kurt Busiek <kurt@[EMA  2008-02-21 16:57:40 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-22 00:22:55 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Robert Sneddon <fred@[  2008-02-20 20:44:57 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-20 19:56:40 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
ken65@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-20 14:02:55 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-20 22:24:03 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
ken65@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-22 12:43:53 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-22 21:28:26 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
dbd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (D  2008-02-22 20:58:54 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
ken65@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-20 14:44:08 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-20 23:20:58 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Bill Snyder <bsnyder@[  2008-02-20 18:11:10 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
ken65@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-23 06:51:15 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
ken65@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-21 10:31:06 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-21 18:41:34 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Bill Snyder <bsnyder@[  2008-02-21 12:47:41 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-21 18:58:48 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"louann_m@[EMAIL PRO  2008-02-22 15:26:46 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Robert Sneddon <fred@[  2008-02-26 11:20:52 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
dbell@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-28 07:35:22 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Willie.Mookie@[EMAIL PROT  2008-02-15 16:13:55 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
dbd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (D  2008-02-15 21:59:18 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-16 04:38:34 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Matthias Warkus <Warku  2008-02-16 09:16:02 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Willie.Mookie@[EMAIL PROT  2008-02-16 03:32:55 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-16 10:23:56 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Sean O'Hara <seanohara  2008-02-16 16:12:24 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Willie.Mookie@[EMAIL PROT  2008-02-16 03:35:34 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-16 13:02:54 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-16 18:29:29 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Aaron Denney <wnoise@[  2008-02-16 18:53:43 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Kurt Busiek <kurt@[EMA  2008-02-16 11:00:33 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Sean O'Hara <seanohara  2008-02-16 16:26:36 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Willie.Mookie@[EMAIL PROT  2008-02-16 03:38:49 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-16 10:21:40 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Dimensional Travele  2008-02-16 11:20:10 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Kat R <null.space@[EMA  2008-02-16 14:32:59 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-16 19:39:36 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-16 12:45:42 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-17 00:50:47 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-16 16:55:45 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
John Schilling <schill  2008-02-16 17:30:34 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-17 02:20:08 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
John Schilling <schill  2008-02-17 08:47:07 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL  2008-02-17 16:57:10 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-17 10:50:44 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-17 11:34:27 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL  2008-02-17 19:39:27 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Johnston <david@  2008-02-17 19:48:27 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-17 12:08:12 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-17 12:25:52 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-18 19:23:57 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-21 19:21:54 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-21 19:48:40 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-17 21:54:26 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-18 19:24:58 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-19 01:00:10 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-02-19 03:16:58 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-19 04:03:47 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-02-19 05:28:06 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-20 01:39:28 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-02-20 02:49:20 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
John Schilling <schill  2008-02-19 18:25:03 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-20 02:49:28 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-21 19:25:49 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-02-21 21:02:36 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
John Schilling <schill  2008-02-22 17:19:32 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-18 01:20:27 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-18 19:23:17 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-18 17:52:25 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-18 23:00:50 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-18 22:12:37 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-02-19 03:26:41 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-19 00:11:46 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-02-19 05:31:03 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-19 03:06:40 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-19 17:21:33 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-21 19:27:14 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-21 19:31:55 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Jasper Janssen <jasper  2008-03-11 21:01:39 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-18 19:22:47 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-18 17:54:24 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-18 23:03:21 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-18 22:14:27 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-19 17:22:27 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL  2008-02-19 15:50:22 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-19 17:30:22 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-20 02:18:37 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-02-20 02:49:56 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-19 12:00:52 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-19 21:29:15 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Jasper Janssen <jasper  2008-03-11 21:07:50 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-03-11 23:03:48 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-18 01:19:00 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
John Schilling <schill  2008-02-17 15:09:38 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-18 19:21:58 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-18 19:56:25 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-18 21:40:05 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-18 21:51:48 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-18 22:19:17 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-18 22:56:09 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-18 23:05:10 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-18 23:12:09 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-18 23:24:23 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-18 23:50:58 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-19 00:00:58 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-18 16:43:28 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-02-19 03:14:41 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-19 03:53:39 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-02-18 23:18:57 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-18 21:20:34 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-19 00:12:36 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-18 21:21:18 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-02-19 05:26:30 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Howard Brazee <pbrazee  2008-02-19 05:55:09 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Jasper Janssen <jasper  2008-03-11 21:11:05 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-03-11 23:04:32 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Jasper Janssen <jasper  2008-03-28 00:14:06 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-03-27 23:26:54 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-18 16:42:47 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-19 00:48:13 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-18 22:16:42 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-02-19 03:29:01 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-19 03:41:20 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-02-19 05:21:25 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-19 03:38:07 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-19 00:13:14 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-19 05:21:01 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-02-19 05:32:17 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-19 05:43:25 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-19 17:25:14 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-19 03:25:48 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-19 09:21:40 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-19 12:13:17 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-02-19 12:33:15 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Bill Snyder <bsnyder@[  2008-02-19 12:35:25 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-02-19 15:24:53 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-19 14:26:02 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-19 20:26:30 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Kurt Busiek <kurt@[EMA  2008-02-19 11:50:28 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-02-19 15:25:48 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-19 20:23:13 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-02-19 05:26:07 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-21 19:31:08 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-21 19:56:39 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Aaron Denney <wnoise@[  2008-02-21 19:59:01 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"pullo" <pul  2008-02-21 21:29:42 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-21 20:07:13 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-21 20:11:13 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Harmon <source@[  2008-02-21 12:44:35 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-21 21:46:36 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-21 23:18:35 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-21 23:23:56 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-21 23:34:07 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-21 23:38:12 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-21 23:51:58 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-21 23:59:15 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-22 00:26:37 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Sean O'Hara <seanohara  2008-02-22 09:43:13 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-02-22 10:32:37 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-22 17:46:49 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
dbd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (D  2008-02-22 13:29:55 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-22 18:08:36 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
goldfarb@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-02-23 10:43:46 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
douglas winston <dougl  2008-02-23 10:06:57 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-23 17:55:06 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Jasper Janssen <jasper  2008-03-11 21:16:36 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-03-11 23:05:14 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Harmon <source@[  2008-02-22 08:48:34 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-22 17:47:28 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-21 21:17:32 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-21 21:48:10 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-21 23:19:19 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-21 23:24:15 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-21 23:34:34 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-21 20:18:38 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-21 21:21:14 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-21 12:39:06 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-21 21:22:48 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-21 21:44:07 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-21 21:54:38 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-22 07:36:28 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-22 08:15:52 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-22 08:19:21 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-23 04:21:47 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-02-22 00:18:32 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Sean O'Hara <seanohara  2008-02-21 19:26:02 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-21 16:50:38 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-26 16:20:23 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"AJ" <tortur  2008-02-26 12:38:43 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL  2008-02-26 16:40:07 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Harmon <source@[  2008-02-26 09:50:23 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling&quo  2008-02-26 09:16:29 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
tmcd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-02-26 17:17:25 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-26 10:13:53 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-26 10:37:39 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-21 16:51:11 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"pullo" <pul  2008-02-21 21:02:13 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-21 18:08:45 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-21 16:45:31 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Howard Brazee <pbrazee  2008-02-22 05:57:57 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-26 16:16:27 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-02-26 17:09:00 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-02-21 21:21:23 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-21 16:38:25 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-02-22 04:40:49 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-21 21:40:51 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
John Schilling <schill  2008-02-22 17:19:31 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-23 01:37:58 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-02-23 02:53:17 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-23 03:49:44 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-23 03:59:45 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
dbd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (D  2008-02-23 03:45:02 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-02-23 06:07:10 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-26 19:40:52 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling&quo  2008-02-26 12:21:14 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-02-27 15:09:16 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-26 16:06:35 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling&quo  2008-02-26 09:15:40 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-26 10:18:43 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling&quo  2008-02-26 10:32:03 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-26 11:06:02 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling&quo  2008-02-26 12:18:47 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-26 22:22:19 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-27 21:34:09 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-28 01:09:20 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-26 19:35:32 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-26 12:10:04 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-26 20:14:51 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-26 12:20:00 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-26 20:39:21 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-26 22:19:41 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-27 07:05:58 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-27 03:01:16 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
wdstarr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-27 20:48:55 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Bill Snyder <bsnyder@[  2008-02-27 09:30:38 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-27 10:34:06 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Sean O'Hara <seanohara  2008-02-27 12:09:04 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-26 20:16:51 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-26 22:24:09 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-27 07:08:06 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-27 03:00:28 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-02-27 19:04:22 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-27 18:11:14 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Sean O'Hara <seanohara  2008-02-28 11:32:43 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
lathamr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-27 22:24:33 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-28 03:47:34 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-27 20:41:20 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-28 05:04:00 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Sea Wasp <seawaspObvio  2008-02-28 07:10:53 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-02-28 05:55:53 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-28 09:21:50 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling&quo  2008-02-28 19:18:52 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Robert A. Woodward&  2008-02-28 23:27:06 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Sea Wasp <seawaspObvio  2008-02-28 21:06:33 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
cgoodin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-28 18:03:33 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Sea Wasp <seawaspObvio  2008-02-28 21:17:39 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-02-28 19:57:04 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
cgoodin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-29 18:53:32 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Sea Wasp <seawaspObvio  2008-02-29 21:14:49 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
cgoodin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-03-04 18:04:57 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Peter Bruells <usernet  2008-03-05 08:58:54 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Sea Wasp <seawaspObvio  2008-03-05 08:10:53 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Peter Bruells <usernet  2008-03-05 15:20:13 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-03-05 07:20:49 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Peter Bruells <usernet  2008-03-05 16:32:38 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-03-05 08:36:33 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Sea Wasp <seawaspObvio  2008-03-05 20:37:39 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
cgoodin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-03-06 18:31:33 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Sea Wasp <seawaspObvio  2008-03-06 19:13:31 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Patrick Baldwin <pax@[  2008-03-07 17:38:29 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-05 19:49:50 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Sean O'Hara <seanohara  2008-02-28 13:28:11 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-29 21:59:29 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
douglas winston <dougl  2008-02-29 18:55:50 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-02-28 05:52:04 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-28 09:18:24 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL  2008-02-28 16:29:29 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
John Schilling <schill  2008-02-28 17:34:47 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-02-28 19:53:57 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-26 19:33:18 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-26 12:11:38 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-26 20:18:16 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
dbd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (D  2008-02-26 18:33:05 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Marcus L. Rowland&q  2008-02-27 19:47:20 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Moriarty <blues95@[EMA  2008-02-27 14:05:33 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
tmcd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-02-27 22:18:09 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-26 19:29:48