Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Science Fiction > Written > Re: WTC Towers:...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 2 of 31 Topic 20577 of 23003
Post > Topic >>

Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition

by "David Morgan \(MAMS\)" <findme@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Mar 9, 2008 at 06:49 AM

"Bush Sux Clinton Sux" <bush.sux@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message

> Politicians suck, everybody knows they suck, and everybody knows
> there is not a damned thing any of us poor slobs can do about it.
>
> Mike


This sort of apathy and complacence is exactly what brought about
this  freaking nightmare.

DM








    About the time our original 13 states adopted their
    new constitution, in the year 1787, Alexander Tyler
    (a Scottish history professor at The University of
    Edinburgh) had this to say about "The Fall of The
    Athenian Republic" some 2,000 years prior.....


"A democracy is always tem****ary in nature; it simply
cannot exist as a permanent form of government. A
democracy will continue to exist up until the time
that voters discover that they can vote themselves
generous gifts from the public treasury. From that
moment on, the majority always votes for the
candidates who promise the most benefits from the
public treasury, with the result that every democracy
will finally collapse due to loose fiscal policy,
(which is) always followed by a dictator****p."

"The average age of the world's greatest civilizations
from the beginning of history, has been about 200
years. During those 200 years, these nations always
progressed through the following sequence:

 From bondage to spiritual faith;
 From spiritual faith to great courage;
 From courage to liberty;
 From liberty to abundance;
 From abundance to complacency;
 From complacency to apathy;
 From apathy to dependence;
 From dependence back into bondage."


    The U.S. is now somewhere between the
    "complacency and apathy" phase of Professor Tyler's
    definition of democracy; with some 40 percent of the
    nation's population already having reached the
    "governmental dependency" phase.











        "A society whose citizens refuse to see and investigate the
        facts, who refuse to believe that their government and their
        media will routinely lie to them and fabricate a reality
        contrary to verifiable facts, is a society that chooses and
        deserves the Police State Dictator****p it's going to get."
                               -- Ian Williams Goddard
 




 31 Posts in Topic:
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
Jenn <jennconductsREMO  2008-03-09 03:10:36 
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2008-03-09 06:49:56 
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
Thomas Armagost <silly  2008-03-09 09:03:10 
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
kludge@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-09 09:36:34 
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-03-09 18:18:49 
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
"Mike Schilling"  2008-03-09 18:24:02 
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-03-09 18:46:04 
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
nance@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-11 12:34:36 
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
"Glenn Dowdy" &  2008-03-10 10:06:10 
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-10 18:23:56 
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
Walter Bushell <proto@  2008-03-10 18:24:45 
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-03-10 22:29:46 
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
kludge@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-11 09:01:01 
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-03-11 17:51:29 
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-03-11 18:01:12 
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
Les Cargill <lcargill@  2008-03-11 21:04:32 
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
John Schilling <schill  2008-03-11 18:09:12 
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-03-12 01:39:37 
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
"Mike Schilling"  2008-03-11 18:51:14 
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-03-12 02:03:16 
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
"Mike Schilling"  2008-03-12 02:28:45 
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-03-12 02:45:32 
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
The Kat <news1@[EMAIL   2008-03-11 20:05:30 
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
John Schilling <schill  2008-03-12 18:54:53 
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
"Mike Schilling"  2008-03-11 18:49:09 
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
John Schilling <schill  2008-03-12 18:54:53 
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
"Mike Schilling"  2008-03-13 02:12:14 
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
Walter Bushell <proto@  2008-03-13 03:53:38 
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
Walter Bushell <proto@  2008-03-13 03:52:59 
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
wdstarr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-03-10 19:28:52 
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2008-03-11 09:16:34 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Mon Dec 1 17:39:05 CST 2008.