Re: Authors Who Should Retire

On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 07:53:39 -0700 (PDT), "Richard R. Hershberger"
<rrhersh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>On Mar 11, 2:12 am, Lawrence Watt-Evans <l...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>> Also, from a purely practical standpoint, there aren't enough reliable
>> old authors still writing to fill every publisher's schedule.  There
>> are a LOT of books being published these days.  They have to come from
>> somewhere, and Heinlein, Herbert, and Asimov are dead.
>
>For years I've been seeing the complaint that the publi****ng industry
>is dying because so many titles are being published [insert Yogi Berra
>quote here].  I've never quite figured out the logic of this.  It
>makes sense for an author trying to get attention to complain about
>this, but that is not at all the same thing as the industry as a
>whole.

I don't think it's killing the industry, but it does hurt profits
because you lose economies of scale.

If you put out 10 titles and each one sells 150,000 copies at $5.00
apiece (I'm assuming a low-end paperback house, obviously), that's
$7.5 million gross.

If you put out 100 titles and each one sells 15,000 copies at $5.00
apiece, you still gross $7.5 million, but you had to pay fixed
expenses -- editor's salary, copy-editing fees, printer's set-up
costs, cover art -- on 100 books instead of 10.  For those extra 90
books, that all comes out of your profits and could be the difference
between making money and losing it.

This is, in fact, very roughly what's happening in the publi****ng
business -- in order to compete for shelf space in the stores,
publishers are putting out lots of titles, but the average sales per
title are way down because readers aren't buying that many more books.

In 1968, I am given to understand (I wasn't publi****ng yet), an
average midlist SF/F paperback sold maybe 150,000 copies, but there
were only maybe twenty titles a month being published.

In 1988 there were about 100 titles a month, and average sales were
maybe 35,000 copies.

Now there are about 200 titles a month, not counting small press and
e-books, and average sales run 20,000 copies.  

So publishers are making less money per book, driving up over prices,
which drives down sales, creating a vicious circle.  There are more
authors being published, but they make less money and get less
attention.

I've over-simplified all this, of course; I've ignored things like the
rise of chain bookstores, the collapse of the ID paperback
distribution system that had dominated the market from 19957 to 1993,
the huge increase in hardcover sales, etc.





-- 
My webpage is at http://www.watt-evans.com
The seventh issue of Helix is now at  http://www.helixsf.com