Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Science Fiction > Written > Re: WTC Towers:...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 16 of 31 Topic 20577 of 22999
Post > Topic >>

Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition

by Les Cargill <lcargill@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Mar 11, 2008 at 09:04 PM

Gene Ward Smith wrote:
> Walter Bushell <proto@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
news:proto-E93B6E.18244510032008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 70-1-84-166.area1.spcsdns.net:
> 
>> Speaking of politicians sucking, our esteemed and honorable governor of

>> the State of New York has just been brought up on a Federal rap of 
>> violating the Mann Act.
> 
> Indeed. And if someone can explain why what he did had a Federal law
against 
> it, I'd be interested.
> 

http://www.nysun.com/article/72642?page_no=2

"The criminal complaint claims that client 9, believed to be Mr. 
Spitzer, told a woman allegedly linked to Emperors Club that he had a 
balance of $400 or $500 with the service that would cover train fare for 
the prostitute from New York to Wa****ngton. Several legal experts said 
that if client 9 is indeed Mr. Spitzer, he appeared to have violated the 
Mann Act. "


and then it says:

"A Supreme Court ruling found that the prostitute who crosses interstate 
lines cannot be charged under the Mann Act."


--
Les Cargill
 




 31 Posts in Topic:
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
Jenn <jennconductsREMO  2008-03-09 03:10:36 
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2008-03-09 06:49:56 
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
Thomas Armagost <silly  2008-03-09 09:03:10 
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
kludge@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-09 09:36:34 
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-03-09 18:18:49 
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
"Mike Schilling"  2008-03-09 18:24:02 
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-03-09 18:46:04 
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
nance@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-11 12:34:36 
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
"Glenn Dowdy" &  2008-03-10 10:06:10 
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-10 18:23:56 
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
Walter Bushell <proto@  2008-03-10 18:24:45 
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-03-10 22:29:46 
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
kludge@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-11 09:01:01 
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-03-11 17:51:29 
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-03-11 18:01:12 
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
Les Cargill <lcargill@  2008-03-11 21:04:32 
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
John Schilling <schill  2008-03-11 18:09:12 
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-03-12 01:39:37 
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
"Mike Schilling"  2008-03-11 18:51:14 
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-03-12 02:03:16 
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
"Mike Schilling"  2008-03-12 02:28:45 
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-03-12 02:45:32 
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
The Kat <news1@[EMAIL   2008-03-11 20:05:30 
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
John Schilling <schill  2008-03-12 18:54:53 
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
"Mike Schilling"  2008-03-11 18:49:09 
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
John Schilling <schill  2008-03-12 18:54:53 
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
"Mike Schilling"  2008-03-13 02:12:14 
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
Walter Bushell <proto@  2008-03-13 03:53:38 
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
Walter Bushell <proto@  2008-03-13 03:52:59 
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
wdstarr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-03-10 19:28:52 
Re: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2008-03-11 09:16:34 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Mon Dec 1 15:11:32 CST 2008.