On 2008-03-13, Bill Snyder <bsnyder@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 22:01:48 -0500, Jim Lovejoy <nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
>>Something that gets rid of the spammer after months of agony, agony
during
>>which it's unable to spam, is clearly preferable.
>
> Hmmm, well, introduction of gradually-increasing amounts of arsenic
> into the spammer's food and water might do it; but it would be
> difficult to manage. And there is of course the question as to
> whether torturing a spammer counts as cruelty to animals.
Only if you use animals to do so. (e.g. attack dogs).
--
Aaron Denney
-><-
|
