Aaron Denney <wnoise@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
news:slrnfthrob.2gf.wnoise@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On 2008-03-13, Bill Snyder <bsnyder@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 22:01:48 -0500, Jim Lovejoy <nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> wrote:
>>>Something that gets rid of the spammer after months of agony, agony
>>>during which it's unable to spam, is clearly preferable.
>>
>> Hmmm, well, introduction of gradually-increasing amounts of arsenic
>> into the spammer's food and water might do it; but it would be
>> difficult to manage. And there is of course the question as to
>> whether torturing a spammer counts as cruelty to animals.
>
> Only if you use animals to do so. (e.g. attack dogs).
>
And then only if the animals (e.g. attack dogs) don't enjoy it.
|
