On 2008-03-15, Jim Lovejoy <nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Aaron Denney <wnoise@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
> news:slrnfthrob.2gf.wnoise@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> On 2008-03-13, Bill Snyder <bsnyder@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 22:01:48 -0500, Jim Lovejoy <nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>> wrote:
>>>>Something that gets rid of the spammer after months of agony, agony
>>>>during which it's unable to spam, is clearly preferable.
>>>
>>> Hmmm, well, introduction of gradually-increasing amounts of arsenic
>>> into the spammer's food and water might do it; but it would be
>>> difficult to manage. And there is of course the question as to
>>> whether torturing a spammer counts as cruelty to animals.
>>
>> Only if you use animals to do so. (e.g. attack dogs).
>>
> And then only if the animals (e.g. attack dogs) don't enjoy it.
Oh, they'll probably enjoy the attacking, but the stomach ulcers later
on are another matter.
--
Aaron Denney
-><-
|
