"MURS radios" <horseshoe7@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:ca640fde-6337-426b-b4e9-40e41de605dd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Mar 18, 8:08 pm, "Iconoclast" <iconocl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> Justices agree on right to own guns
>> By MARK SHERMAN, Associated Press Writer 11 minutes ago
>>
>> Americans have a right to own guns, Supreme Court justices declared
>> Tuesday
>> in a historic and lively debate that could lead to the most significant
>> interpretation of the Second Amendment since its ratification two
>> centuries
>> ago.
>
> Thank God.
>
> Ginsberg and Stevens can't hold on much longer - maybe they can make
> it to 2008, to outlast Bush... and that brings up one of the only ways
> McCain can secure my vote - IF McCain pledges to put in place judges
> "who will uphold the constitution" (and conservative in the sense of
> 2nd and 10th amendment rights, border security and srcunching the
Don't count on McCain.
Why do you think he failed in the 2000 election?
He had my vote until I was watching MSNBC when they were broadcasting a
radio program where he was being interviewed, and had callers asking him
questions.
One person , who clearly loved guns, asked him about his committment to
the
2nd. His final response to him was, "We don't have the same view of what
the
2nd Amendment is."
> ILLEGAL ALIEN INVASION FROM MEXICO... I really don't care if the
> judges he appoints will tend to leave Roe vs. Wade intact... banning
> 3rd trimester abortions I'd be willing to give a go, however). We
> need more justices like Roberts, Scalia, Thomas, and Alito... even
> another Kennedy would be a darn sight better than Ginsberg or
> Stevens. Souter has been a big disappointment. Breyer is a lib, who
> we will have to live with for some time... but he can be NEUTRALIZED
> if McCain can appoint a Constitutionalist in place of ACLU'er
> Ginsberg, or "superlib" Stevens.
>
> - Stewart (San Diego Minuteman)
|
