adman said the following on 3/19/2008 4:05 AM:
> "Jon Schild" <jjs@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:frpja2$egp$2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |
> | Sound of Fart wrote:
> | > http://www.lewrockwell.com/reed/reed59.html
> | >
> | > The Metaphysics of Evolution
> | >
> | > by Fred Reed
> | >
> | >
> | [lots of crap snipped]
> |
> | So, this boils down to the idea that science has one chance to get
every
> | detail of an idea right, and if there is ever any refinement, it
proves
> | that the whole science is wrong. What a load of bullcookies.
>
>
> If something is wrong then it needs to be changed. If something needs
> constant revision, then the foundation was wrong. It is really THAT
simple.
Um, you make constant revisions on a daily basis. If there is a car
accident on the way to work, you need to revise your driving plan. If
your computer crashes, you need to revise your plan. If you open a loaf
of bread and it is moldy, you need to revise your plan.
Revision isn't weakness, you Orwellian idiot. When they build a bridge,
they have gaps in the structure to allow for the expansion and
contraction of the materials, revisions, if you will, in its structure.
Have a "one-piece" bridge and it'll collapse.
"He believes the same thing on Wednesday that he did on Monday,
regardless of what happens on Tuesday." --Stephen Colbert
--
********************************************************
* DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226 *
* BAAWA Knight - Latheist Division *
* "We Are the Latheist Thuns of Bithes You Ever Thaw." *
*------------------------------------------------------*
* "The Bible is not my book nor Christianity my *
* profession. I could never give assent to the long, *
* complicated statements of Christian dogma." *
* --Abraham Lincoln *
********************************************************
|
