Re: Another meaningless rant against Evolution

On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 06:05:04 -0600, adman wrote:

> 
> "Jon Schild" <jjs@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
> news:frpja2$egp$2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |
> | Sound of Fart wrote:
> | > http://www.lewrockwell.com/reed/reed59.html
> | >
> | > The Metaphysics of Evolution
> | >
> | > by Fred Reed
> | >
> | >
> | [lots of crap snipped]
> |
> | So, this boils down to the idea that science has one chance to get
every
> | detail of an idea right, and if there is ever any refinement, it
proves
> | that the whole science is wrong.  What a load of bullcookies.
> 
> 
> If something is wrong then it needs to be changed. If something needs 
> constant revision, then the foundation was wrong. It is really THAT
simple.

Gee, that's funny.  Computers have been refined and revised constantly
since ENIAC was built in 1946, yet it appears their foundation is strong. 
Have you ever considered the possibility that you are full of shit?

-- 
MarkA
(This space temporarily unavailable)