Re: Rolling Thunder sequel

Howard wrote:
> On Mar 19, 4:08 pm, "Mike  Schilling" <mscottschill...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> I think William means "Damn, it'll be at least that long before he
>> starts writing Varley books again." That's how I feel too.
>> .
>
> So was it "Red Thunder" that turned both of you off?
>
> I actually think that Varley succeds in "Rolling Thunder" in writing a
> Heinlein juvenileupdated for more of today's audience.

That's what I thought he'd done in _Red Thunder_.   Which is fine, since 
some of the RAH juveniles are exceptional books, but it's not what I read 
Varley for.

>
> Still...I do want "Irontown Blues"....

Me too.