Re: Another meaningless rant against Evolution

"MarkA" <nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:pan.2008.03.19.17.33.39.367262@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 06:05:04 -0600, adman wrote:
|
| >
| > "Jon Schild" <jjs@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
| > news:frpja2$egp$2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| > |
| > | Sound of Fart wrote:
| > | > http://www.lewrockwell.com/reed/reed59.html
| > | >
| > | > The Metaphysics of Evolution
| > | >
| > | > by Fred Reed
| > | >
| > | >
| > | [lots of crap snipped]
| > |
| > | So, this boils down to the idea that science has one chance to get 
every
| > | detail of an idea right, and if there is ever any refinement, it 
proves
| > | that the whole science is wrong.  What a load of bullcookies.
| >
| >
| > If something is wrong then it needs to be changed. If something needs
| > constant revision, then the foundation was wrong. It is really THAT 
simple.
|
| Gee, that's funny.  Computers have been refined and revised constantly
| since ENIAC was built in 1946, yet it appears their foundation is
strong.
| Have you ever considered the possibility that you are full of shit?

ROFLing!!!

Had Mac won the PC wars of the 80's we would all have REAL computers!






|
| -- 
| MarkA
| (This space temporarily unavailable)
|