Re: Another meaningless rant against Evolution

In article <qr6Ej.21174$Er2.8602@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
"adman" <72545@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> said:

> "Jon Schild" <jjs@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:frpja2$egp$2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> So, this boils down to the idea that science has one chance to
>> get every detail of an idea right, and if there is ever any
>> refinement, it proves that the whole science is wrong.  What a
>> load of bullcookies.
>
> If something is wrong then it needs to be changed.  If something
> needs constant revision, then the foundation was wrong.  It is
> really THAT simple.

*Something* here is certainly simple, anyway.

-- 
William December Starr <wdstarr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>