Re: Rolling Thunder sequel

On Mar 20, 3:02 pm, Gene Ward Smith <g...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> WilliamHyde<wthyde1...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in news:5be5a40a-3969-4b2b-abbc-
> a16d79616...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >> So was it "Red Thunder" that turned both of you of
>
> > Never read it.  Probably never will.
>
> > If  I want to read Heinlein juveniles I have a dozen or so I haven't
> > reread in decades.
>
> It's not really a Heinlein juvenile. It's got the wrong kind of lunacy.

A-actually (he stutters, hanging head in shame) I don't really want to
read *any* juvenile (*ducks*).

William Hyde