"BradGuth" <bradguth@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:07607d59-95b9-41a5-b101-56bcbb32c471@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Mar 25, 9:39 am, m...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>> On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 10:26:53 -0700 (PDT), in sci.space.policy Space
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Cadet <kaw...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >Hi All
>> >I found this on rasfc, thought it might be appropriate to pass it
>> >around to see if we can do something to cut all the crap in here:
>>
>> > > > The headers of posts made via Google include this:
>>
>> >> > Complaints-To: groups-ab...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> >> > I assume that you'd simply write a brief note and attach the
>> >> > offending post, complete with headers. (Actually, the
>> >> > headers alone ought to suffice, since they include the
>> >> > Message-ID.)
>>
>> >> Thanks, I did that last night. My note asked them to please make
>> >> it
>> >> stop, and I got an automated reply that my message had been sent
>> >> to the
>> >> Gmail abuse team. It made me feel better, anyway.
>>
>> >If anyone else wants to complain, you can either do as Brian and
>> >Bill
>> >describe, or (through the web interface):
>>
>> >1. Go tohttp://groups.google.com/group/rec.arts.sf.composition/(*)
>> >2. Click to open the offending threads. (This is where tabbed
>> >browsers
>> >come into their own: on a Mac, I open-apple-clicked on all 16 on
>> >the
>> >first page, and then moved on to the next step.)
>> >3. Find the name with the email address in green - to the right is
>> >'View
>> >profile'(1) and further along 'More options' - click this 'More
>> >options'
>> >link.
>> >4. This brings up a selection of links; on the second row is 'Report
>> >this message'.
>> >5. You get a form to fill out.
>> > a. If you don't want to give them your email I imagine a fake one
>> >will work just as well. After you've filled it out the first time,
>> >if
>> >you've got a nice browser you'll only have to type the first letter
>> >to
>> >bring it up again for subsequent reports.
>> > b. Leave the radio buttons as they are.
>> > c. Type something generic in the text box: I used "This
>> >spam/pornography is flooding rasfc at the moment; can it please be
>> >filtered?" and copied it into my clipboard to use on all 16 reports
>> >I
>> >made (deleting 'pornography' when not appropriate).
>>
>> >If you're doing a whole bunch at a time, you soon get into the
>> >rhythm
>> >of
>> >it; I reported 16 in about 5 minutes.
>>
>> >One hopes that the more people complain, the more likely Google will
>> >actually do something about it.
>>
>> >(1) Following this allows you to report entire users using pretty
>> >much
>> >the same process.
>>
>> It doesn't matter, rec.photo.digital.* just hashed this out. You
>> might
>> care to take a look at:
>> Killing all posts from Google Groups
>> The Usenet Improvement Project:http://improve-usenet.org
>
> "Killing all posts from Google Groups" is all very warm and fuzzy
> Hitler or Zionist of yourself, isn't it.
>
> How about just faith-based book and witch burnings at the stake again,
> or at least good old waterboarding those that post such obvious spam,
> if at all possible?
>
> Obviously "m..." and others of their kind voted for GW Bush and
> company
> of brown-nosed clowns and minions, that would gladly kill off whomever
> for their next buck.
>
> I would argue on behalf of a basic robo-moderator function that could
> just as easily uncover and divert and/or extract such clearly spam
> posted crapolla topics to a similar named group, such as merely having
> the .spam added on, as in sci.space.policy.spam should work rather
> nicely without ever causing total censorship or author banishment
> issues.
>
> BTW, the best of our "Top 10 Space Conspiracy Theories" is still the
> ongoing NASA/Apollo moon landing hoax of our mutually perpetrated
> cold-
> war for profit and global domination century, yet oddly these topics
> of keen interest are getting robo-purged from Usenet, replaced with
> officially posted spam that only sucks and blows, as intended by those
> in charge.
>
> If smart folks as supposedly having all of "the right stuff" had in
> fact been upon the moon and having taken all of those thousands of
> unfiltered Kodak moments (from that physically dark as coal surface as
> well as from orbit), then do tell where's Venus hiding as of missions
> A11, A14 and A16?
>
> Of all the other sorts of gabi40, Clint Eastwood, susi40, susi40001,
> susi40006, mirror server, dlcz, kgkgjkgkgkfgk and perhaps countless
> other trash or spam topics getting forced into the Usenet stack,
> whereas oddly these silly clownish efforts of their mainstream damage-
> control do not seem to bother those in charge of this or any other
> Usenet group. Why is that?
>
> Are these clownish methods of stuffing or force-feeding topics as
> faith-based approved, so as to intentionally block out or displace all
> others, or is this Usenet Group trashing tactic merely of something
> MI5/CIA approved?
>
> As much the same as our team of cloak and dagger wizards having
> terminated the robust portion of ESA'a Venus Express PFS instrument,
> it's yet another interesting note about our physically dark and nasty
> moon, in that all the supposed better science (far better off than
> anything NASA/Apollo or of anything NASA since Apollo) and of
> otherwise perfectly fine expertise of the JAXA/Selene mission is still
> after all of this on-orbit science is officially sequestered, as
> though forced into being taboo/nondisclosure within one of our NASA
> space toilets. (perhaps as parked right next to those 700 missing
> boxes of their Apollo moon landing hoax missions and of all those
> pesky Muslim WMD)
>
> In addition to what little I've discovered, and my having been trying
> within my best dyslexic encrypted ways to share this new and improved
> science about Venus and our moon for the past 8+ years and counting,
> it seems there's lots more to behold about good old Earth that's worth
> our knowing and sharing, such as the many interesting discoveries and
> subsequent topics within the following link: Archaeology Answers
> About Ancient Civilizations Indus River Valley Ancient Maps of the
> World Ancient India Civilizations Ancient China Civilization Egypt
> Ancient Gods Strange Pictures Dead Men's Secrets Lost Technology and
> more...
> www.beforeus.com
>
> Other than my having deductively interpreted via honest
> observationology as to what looks so perfectly intelligent/artificial
> of the Venus tarmac, township/community of large structures, plus the
> surrounding infrastructure and of that nearby bridge as looking so
> gosh darn rational, I can't be absolutely certain about such other
> intelligent life still existing/coexisting on Venus. However, at
> least the regular laws of physics and of the best available science
> can't possibly exclude such, because even us frail humans along with a
> sufficient degree of applied technology could make a go of it,
> especially as for representing ETs capable of getting ourselves to/
> from Venus would in of itself offer more than sufficient technological
> expertise for safely accommodating an extended stay in spite of all
> that geothermally forced environment of Venus being so geologically
> newish, CO2/S8 vapor hot and otherwise downright nasty from the bottom
> up, and otherwise not as we've been informed as being entirely
> greenhouse roasted from the top down. The planet Venus has been
> losing its core energy at the rate of 20.5 w/m2 (roughly 256 fold
> greater than Earth), because Venus is simply geothermally active and
> thus hotter than hell.
>
> -
>
> Where the heck are all of those perfectly good NASA/Apollo moon
> landing hoax topics going? It's as though this Earth is actually
> flat, whereas such topics and of their authors along with each and
> every one of those 700 boxes of our NASA/Apollo mission data just fell
> off the edge.
>
> Perhaps we should take a little reflective quiet time to fully
> appreciate upon the recent intellectual and anti-science imposed
> gauntlets of this Usenet topic/author stalking and science blockage,
> whereas instead of the truth we're seeing forced topic stacking of
> such wordy disinformation crapolla so that the general public or media
> doesn't get an honest wind or otherwise bother to look deep enough
> into this mainstream cesspool of Usenet, as to discover what's really
> going down the drain.
>
> It's exactly like the cloak and dagger worth of those NASA Apollo
> false or dishonest topics having those key search words of NASA,
> Apollo, moon landing and hoax continually included within each and
> every one of those phony postings of obviously bogus topics, that
> which also include naughty smut and porn related context, as clearly
> intended in order to cause automatic filtering of what public schools
> ever get to read, as well as to divert the honest research intentions
> of others, by way of those hidden or cloak and dagger means that
> essentially wash-out or force-purge all previous forms of perfectly
> serious related topics out of their Google/NOVA archives, and thus
> getting removed from their infowar and otherwise mainstream hype
> configured Usenet, so that only the mainstream status quo of topics in
> 100% support of government and of their faith-based NASA/Apollo side
> of this issue remains accessible to the public.
>
> Do yourself a basic favor by simply accomplishing a Google Usenet/
> Group search of ' apollo hoax ' or try ' moon landing ' and then use
> the "sort by date" feature. It's downright funny, isn't it.
>
> In them good old days of applying this form of government and
> theological extremist oversight, or merely orchestrated clownism, as
> such this tactic was mainstream swarm like accomplished via witch and
> book burnings that achieved their form of mainstream damage-control
> trickery of that dark-side era, as well as if need be having put those
> of their own kind on a stick for yet another shock and awe worth of a
> faith-based PR stunt wasn't overlooked.
>
> BTW, my for-real phone of 253-8576061 and email of bradguth@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
or
> bradguth@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(among others) has always been answered by myself, so
> if you're not getting through or you believe that I'm not answering my
> phone or otherwise not reading or much less returning your email, it's
> simply not the least bit intentionally because of myself, but instead
> it's more than likely of those calls or emails of yours have been
> getting systematically intercepted, modified and/or diverted by those
> in charge, and otherwise skewed by those having the most to lose,
> especially if they're not doing their spook and mole like jobs at
> keeping the rest of us supposed village idiots snookered and
> dumbfounded past the point of no return.
>
> If this bad situation of censorship that's clearly getting worse isn't
> exactly of what those global domination Zionists and of their puppet
> Hitler warlord (aka partner in crimes against humanity) had in mind,
> as having since been replaced by our very own warlord(GW Bush) and of
> his born-again faith of brown-nosed minions, then what the hell is?
>
> Seems via those presidential signings and of all those DHS powers of
> God has entirely excluded or having banished all others from taking
> proper action. Again, it's all very Third Reich and otherwise warlord
> and otherwise Old Testament of being Zionist global domination like.
> . - Brad Guth
As I'm posting after Guth's extended diatribe, I
wonder if anyone will see it. So often a lot of
words conceals a lack of content; that readers
would check a couple of screens of that and move
on, seems likely.
Seems to me, we have three our four problems here,
and it's no good to talk about them all at once.
The problems as I see them are,
1) The small but time-honored problem of noisy
but empty verbage from preadolescent minds.
2) The China problem: persons apparently in China
sending large blocks of sales posts, filling up
to 80% of screens; these posts totally irrelevant
to the newsgroup topic (and it's not what the
reader is there for, anyhow).
3) The jamming problem, scatware (repugnantly
scatological) sent in large blocks, filling up
to 80% of screens. (Who; and why? I suspect
the hand of American 3-letter agencies in this
who intend censorship without getting caught
at it.)
4) Miscellaneous other crapware, such as the M15
postings presently abated.
5) Finally, link posters: people who do not
trouble themselves to think; rather, they just put
a link up and that's the post. *Whatever happened*
to the idea here of people typing in a few short
paragraphs to exchange thinking and views? ??
Is it possible to write software that can identify
these things, and automatically block them? The
scatware should be very easy to stop: the porn
vocabulary seems to me entirely separate from any
space topic vocabulary. But for the rest of this,
if we cannot harden usenet against this rubbish,
thrown in for whatever reason, then I believe the
value of usenet, once very high, goes to zero.
Titeotwawki -- mha [sci.space.policy 2008 Mar 25]
|
