Re: Scott Sigler's Infected

Ken from Chicago wrote:
> "ravenlynne" <ravenlynne@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
> news:fskjha0md0@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>>Mike Schilling wrote:
>>
>>>Beowulf Bolt wrote:
>>>
>>>>ravenlynne wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>I don't believe that I was actually advertising, but ok. No good deed
>>>>>goes unpunished.
>>>>
>>>> Let's just state that your post triggered some active antibodies
>>>>thanks to a series of recent spams and spam-by-proxies.  Methinks
>>>>sensitivities are up for any post that smacks of advertisement,
>>>>whether intended as such or not.
>>>
>>>That's fair.  Sorry if I went a bit hair-trigger, ravenlynne.
>>
>>Completely understandable in light of some of the tripe that gets posted

>>here.
> 
> 
> WHAT?!!! You two DARE to be ... REASONABLE ... and NOT OVERREACT ...
online? 
> on the usenet?!?!! How DARE you?!!!

	Shut up, you troll! I'll call the moderator on you!


-- 
                      Sea Wasp
                        /^\
                        ;;;	
      Live Journal: http://seawasp.livejournal.com