::: I could be wrong, ohg V pbapyhqr Ynfpvry'f funqbj vf fgvyy urycvat
::: Uneel va fbzr jnl. I'll have to re-read with that in mind.
:: V qba'g oryvrir gung'f npphengr. Vg'f tbar. Pbzcyrgryl. Jungrire
:: vg unq nyernql qbar fgvyy erznvaf ubjrire.
V qba'g guvax gung pna rkcynva yrneavat ragveryl arj fxvyyf.
: Eric D. Berge <eric_berge @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
hotmail.com.invalid>
: Hu, ab - lbh'er obgu jebat. Vg jnf rkcyvpvgyl rkcynvarq ng gur raq
: rknpgyl jub jnf urycvat uvz bhg.
Yeah, that's what they said. Given the way the incidents are described,
their nature, and given gur thvgne cynlvat vapvqrag in White Night,
I'm very suspicious of that explanation.
On the other hand, it would explain fixing the Chicago model better
than my suspicion, and maybe a few other scattered incidents. But then,
that intervention happened so *soon*, that it's a bit odd Harry was being
helped even then.
All in all, I'm still left with an "I could be wrong, but" feeling.
And of course, it's always possible that whether advertently or in,
Ynfpvry cynagrq n onpx qbbe va Uneel sbe Hevry gb hfr.
Sigh.
Wayne Throop throopw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://sheol.org/throopw
|
