In article <Xns9A7CB1B3AF0C6genewardsmithsbcglob@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
Gene Ward Smith <gene@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>ted@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Ted Nolan <tednolan>) wrote in news:_8yLj.34585
>$rC6.21625@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> BTW, how does he fall under the 100-year rule? IIRC, he died working
in
>> Hollywood on the initial idea for King Kong, so that puts him well
under
>the
>> limit.
>
>The point is, he's well under the limit and people seem to have stopped
>reading his once immensely popular books anyway.
>
Sure, and that may stand for the rest of the 100-year period, or he could
undergo a revival like Lovecraft or Howard. Not that I want to stay in
the weeds on that point, never having read him, I'm also interested in
any responses to your query for some good books of his.
Ted
--
------
columbiaclosings.com
What's not in Columbia anymore..
|
