On 15 Apr, 20:33, mimus <tinmimu...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 10:01:18 -0700, The Starmaker wrote:
> > On Apr 12, 7:20=A0am, "Suresh M.Sc" <suresh.ra...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >> Mathematicsisthe king of arts and the queen of all sciences.
> >> Isn't?WhatisMathematics actually? Give me a best definition for
> >> Mathematics. Thanks.
>
> > Mathematics is the new Holy Bible! It's an invention. It was invented
> > for the same
> > reason the bible was invented, to explain the universe to others.
>
> Mathematics is the description of form, and both form and its
description
> at bottom and simplest are binary (try to go simpler), best and most
> simply described in the form (heh) of two laws, best and most simply
> symbolized as
>
> ()()=3D()
No no {}^{}=3D{} this house can hold infinitly many baboons so it was
written
> and
>
> (())=3D
{{}}=3D oh how beautiful behold mother baboon with young baboon,
accomplish nothing.
=3D{}{} behold two twin baboons given birth by a virgin entity
>
> and renderable in English as
>
> "Crossing from one binary state to the other more than once still leaves
> you in the second state"
>
> and
>
> "Crossing from one binary state to the other and back again leaves you
in
> the original state."
>
> Note that these are _not_ arbitrary "axioms"; they are verifiable
> observations, in a plethora of concrete examples; they are natural laws.
>
> The arithmetic and algebra arising from the above two laws comprise the
F2=
> group of laws; the F3 would be trinary form, and so on.
>
> Application of the F2 group to the truth-values of propositions gives us
> the L group of laws, propositional logic.
>
> Application of the F2 and L groups to sets gives us the S group of laws,
> elementary set theory.
>
> And application of all the foregoing to numbers gives us the N groups of
> laws, number theory.
>
> After which comes the G group (geometry) and P group (physics, at base
> interpretable as applied geometry, adding both intension, as opposed to
> extension, and dynamism) of laws.
>
> Etc.
>
> See _Laws of Form_, Russell 'n' Whitehead's _Principia Mathematica_, the
> Metamath Project and so on (the group-names, with the exception IIRC of
th=
e "L
> group", used are my own, although the ascending hierarchy of formal
> complexity is that of ordinary formal mathematics-- which has issued in
> more than one competing theory, unfortunately).
>
> --
>
> "The math is easy," said Chaos.
>
> < _Thief of Time_
|
