Re: questionable conception

Wayne Throop wrote:
> Eh, I suppose I should post this on the QC forums, or not at all,
> but I thinkt his topic came up here sometime in the dimmly remembered
past;
> 
>     http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1125
> 
> Apparently, he doesn't know who's conception was immaculate.
> Just goes to show you shouldn't trust what you learn in webcomics,
> I suppose.

You are aware that the "immaculate" in "immaculate conception" DOESN'T 
refer to virginity and/or lack of ***ual activity; it refers to a state 
of grace i.e. being without sin. The belief is that Mary was immaculate 
because she was without original sin.

Isn't it wonderful how myths can be discussed almost as if there were 
reality involved? Let's talk about Frodo now.