Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Science Fiction > Written > Re: questionabl...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 71 of 87 Topic 21144 of 22908
Post > Topic >>

Re: questionable conception

by Gene Ward Smith <gene@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 22, 2008 at 05:43 PM

throopw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Wayne Throop) wrote in news:1208884632@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> And, as you point out, Mary's conception was immaculate, but not
virginal.

Why not, though? The Church theory is that the sacrifice of the cross
travels 
back in time and zaps Mary. Instead of time-travelling atonement juice,
just 
create a fertilized egg and implant it in St. Anne's womb. You might
complain 
that this violates Church teaching about the correct way of going about 
conception, but you are already planning to do that with Jesus and anyway,

you are God. You make the rules.
 




 87 Posts in Topic:
questionable conception
throopw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-21 04:44:20 
Re: questionable conception
djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-21 05:11:47 
Re: questionable conception
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-04-21 05:52:36 
Re: questionable conception
djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-21 14:57:46 
Re: questionable conception
Kevin <ktn3654@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 20:38:44 
Re: questionable conception
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-04-21 21:04:01 
Re: questionable conception
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-04-23 21:25:32 
Re: questionable conception
djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 23:40:28 
Re: questionable conception
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-04-23 23:51:58 
Re: questionable conception
djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 00:01:07 
Re: questionable conception
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-04-24 02:59:29 
Re: questionable conception
Kevin <ktn3654@[EMAIL   2008-04-24 00:52:30 
Re: questionable conception
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-04-24 03:01:17 
Re: questionable conception
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-04-24 03:23:44 
Re: questionable conception
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-04-25 05:59:21 
Re: questionable conception
dbd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (D  2008-04-24 23:01:44 
Re: questionable conception
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-04-25 16:35:24 
Re: questionable conception
throopw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-21 23:16:48 
Re: questionable conception
"Mike Schilling"  2008-04-22 03:34:45 
Re: questionable conception
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-04-23 21:26:17 
Re: questionable conception
"Mike Schilling"  2008-04-23 21:56:10 
Re: questionable conception
"Mike Schilling"  2008-04-21 06:39:47 
Re: questionable conception
Sean O'Hara <seanohara  2008-04-21 11:46:20 
Re: questionable conception
throopw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-21 07:03:15 
Re: questionable conception
djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-21 15:03:47 
Re: questionable conception
Will in New Haven <bil  2008-04-21 09:26:05 
Re: questionable conception
"Mike Schilling"  2008-04-22 03:36:18 
Re: questionable conception
throopw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-21 18:12:55 
Re: questionable conception
jdnicoll@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-04-21 18:24:09 
Re: questionable conception
"Mike Schilling"  2008-04-22 03:35:24 
Re: questionable conception
djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-22 15:26:01 
Re: questionable conception
"Mike Schilling"  2008-04-22 22:09:13 
Re: questionable conception
Sean O'Hara <seanohara  2008-04-23 11:34:01 
Re: questionable conception
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-04-23 21:22:49 
Re: questionable conception
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-04-23 21:19:10 
Re: questionable conception
"Mike Schilling"  2008-04-23 21:39:20 
Re: questionable conception
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-04-23 23:03:16 
Re: questionable conception
"Mike Schilling"  2008-04-23 16:10:30 
Re: questionable conception
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-04-23 23:19:55 
Re: questionable conception
wdstarr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 19:20:19 
Re: questionable conception
norrin <adweiland@[EMA  2008-04-23 07:03:22 
Re: questionable conception
Sean O'Hara <seanohara  2008-04-23 11:35:22 
Re: questionable conception
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-04-23 10:29:58 
Re: questionable conception
herwin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-26 10:59:26 
Re: questionable conception
"Mike Schilling"  2008-04-26 08:36:40 
Re: questionable conception
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-04-23 17:26:37 
Re: questionable conception
djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 18:17:45 
Re: questionable conception
dbd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (D  2008-04-23 11:58:49 
Re: questionable conception
djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 21:12:23 
Re: questionable conception
"Mike Schilling"  2008-04-23 21:37:38 
Re: questionable conception
William George Ferguson &  2008-04-23 15:53:09 
Re: questionable conception
dbd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (D  2008-04-23 16:20:06 
Re: questionable conception
djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 23:42:59 
Re: questionable conception
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-04-24 00:16:30 
Re: questionable conception
Taki Kogoma <quirk@[EM  2008-04-23 20:20:33 
Re: questionable conception
dbd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (D  2008-04-23 18:03:32 
Re: questionable conception
dbd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (D  2008-04-23 18:01:57 
Re: questionable conception
tmcd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-04-25 21:19:47 
Re: questionable conception
"Nobody in particula  2008-04-25 22:28:06 
Re: questionable conception
wdstarr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-26 20:42:57 
Re: questionable conception
Steve Coltrin <spcoltr  2008-04-30 14:53:45 
Re: questionable conception
Graham Woodland <gray@  2008-04-23 21:32:27 
Re: questionable conception
djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 21:13:20 
Re: questionable conception
Kurt Busiek <kurt@[EMA  2008-04-23 14:23:18 
Re: questionable conception
djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 23:45:09 
Re: questionable conception
cryptoguy <treifamily@  2008-04-30 15:07:16 
Re: questionable conception
"Mike Schilling"  2008-04-30 15:55:11 
Re: questionable conception
throopw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 06:43:41 
Re: questionable conception
lal_truckee <lal_truck  2008-04-22 16:49:51 
Re: questionable conception
throopw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-22 17:17:12 
Re: questionable conception
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-04-22 17:43:56 
Re: questionable conception
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-04-23 21:28:02 
Re: questionable conception
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-04-23 22:52:01 
Re: questionable conception
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-04-23 23:02:26 
Re: questionable conception
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-04-23 23:13:33 
Re: questionable conception
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-04-23 23:19:19 
Re: questionable conception
throopw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-22 18:00:08 
Re: questionable conception
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-04-22 18:19:10 
Re: questionable conception
Andrew Plotkin <erkyra  2008-04-22 18:58:16 
Re: questionable conception
"Dan Tilque" &l  2008-04-23 07:38:14 
Re: questionable conception
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-04-23 21:28:44 
Re: questionable conception
djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 23:46:56 
Re: questionable conception
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-04-24 03:02:07 
Re: questionable conception
Aaron Denney <wnoise@[  2008-04-24 04:22:56 
Re: questionable conception
"Christopher Adams&q  2008-04-24 04:33:36 
Re: questionable conception
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-04-24 04:48:10 
Re: questionable conception
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-04-24 16:21:49 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Nov 21 10:55:02 CST 2008.