Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Science Fiction > Written > Re: Missed It B...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 13 of 37 Topic 21091 of 23003
Post > Topic >>

Re: Missed It By That Much

by jdnicoll@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (James Nicoll) Apr 23, 2008 at 04:21 PM

In article
<614ca98c-2485-47b5-a8b9-611fb983add3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
 <ncwaite@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>On 19 Apr, 22:46, nebu...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Joseph Nebus) wrote:
>>         Warning: this is a variant of the 'great science fiction
>> predictions' thread, which I don't think has been around these parts
>> for a couple months at least.  
>>
>>         On a recent re-read of Arthur C Clarke's _Imperial Earth_ I
>> noticed that Clarke got (characteristically [1]) very correct that in
>> The Future we would all have abundant access to phones with multiple
modes
>> of contact, and personal computers with enough storage that their data
>> banks become full of stuff in the 'Miscellaneous' folder, and that to
>> be out of theoretical instant contact with the bulk of humanity would
>> feel almost supernatural.  All told, a mighty good prediction for life
>> in 2006, even if he was nominally aiming for 2276.  
>>
>>         The one oversight: people in his future still have phone
numbers,
>> long and superficially random strings of digits needed to contact them.
 
>> (Worse, they have different numbers for different communication modes.)
 
>> You can in his world easily look up people and get the number, and from
>> the number get to the person, but he seems to have overlooked that the
>> internal need for phone numbers would be tucked into the interior
>> databases and people would just look for names, possibly addresses,
>> instead.
>>
>>         So I'm curious in other predictions that are almost dead-on,
but
>> that miss just a tiny bit in how things did turn out.  
>>
>
>Another Clarke prediction, this time from _The Lost Worlds of 2001_ .
>Once section features some-one receiving what can be best described as
>an e-mail (text message delivered to a terminal).  For some reason,
>however, he describes the message automatically being printed out on
>paper as soon as it was received (more like a telex, I guess) rather
>than being stored and viewed on a monitor.  This is particularly
>jarring since the person receiving the e-mail is on a space****p in
>orbit around Mars, where he might find it difficult to get more paper
>should he happen to run out.

	One of Poul Anderson's books (Don't recall the title: the one
about an alien from Sigma Draconis dropping by) has something like the
WWW that is also limited to printed output.
-- 
http://www.livejournal.com/users/james_nicoll
http://www.cafepress.com/jdnicoll
(For all your "The problem with
defending the English language [...]" T-****rt, cup and tote-bag needs)
 




 37 Posts in Topic:
Missed It By That Much
nebusj-@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-19 16:46:54 
Re: Missed It By That Much
"Dan Goodman" &  2008-04-20 05:22:06 
Re: Missed It By That Much
goldfarb@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-04-20 07:30:06 
Re: Missed It By That Much
"Dan Goodman" &  2008-04-20 23:04:14 
Re: Missed It By That Much
"Richard R. Hershber  2008-04-23 09:57:34 
Re: Missed It By That Much
MajorOz <MajorOz@[EMAI  2008-04-21 13:06:59 
Re: Missed It By That Much
"Richard R. Hershber  2008-04-23 09:58:59 
Re: Missed It By That Much
mstemper@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-04-23 09:43:25 
Re: Missed It By That Much
wdstarr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 18:35:52 
Re: Missed It By That Much
mstemper@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-04-24 10:21:04 
Re: Missed It By That Much
Maxwell Lol <nospam@[E  2008-04-30 07:37:35 
Re: Missed It By That Much
ncwaite@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 08:46:54 
Re: Missed It By That Much
jdnicoll@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-04-23 16:21:15 
Re: Missed It By That Much
"Nobody in particula  2008-04-23 09:26:11 
Re: Missed It By That Much
"Michael S. Schiffer  2008-04-23 18:15:56 
Re: Missed It By That Much
"Mike stone" &l  2008-04-23 22:36:13 
Re: Missed It By That Much
"Richard R. Hershber  2008-04-23 10:02:28 
Re: Missed It By That Much
David Johnston <david@  2008-05-01 17:58:12 
Re: Missed It By That Much
fairwater@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-05-01 23:03:44 
Re: Missed It By That Much
John Schilling <schill  2008-05-02 17:02:50 
Re: Missed It By That Much
wdstarr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 18:41:42 
Re: Missed It By That Much
throopw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 17:15:26 
Re: Missed It By That Much
jdnicoll@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-04-23 17:30:12 
Re: Missed It By That Much
throopw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 17:32:50 
Re: Missed It By That Much
nebusj-@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 15:48:20 
Re: Missed It By That Much
Taki Kogoma <quirk@[EM  2008-04-23 20:08:59 
Re: Missed It By That Much
throopw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 02:43:52 
Re: Missed It By That Much
"W. Citoan" <  2008-04-24 22:31:58 
Re: Missed It By That Much
Taki Kogoma <quirk@[EM  2008-04-24 19:08:19 
Re: Missed It By That Much
cryptoguy <treifamily@  2008-04-30 06:51:46 
Re: Missed It By That Much
wdstarr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-01 04:14:55 
Re: Missed It By That Much
fairwater@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-05-01 17:44:34 
Re: Missed It By That Much
Butch Malahide <fred.g  2008-05-02 20:41:47 
Re: Missed It By That Much
dbd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (D  2008-05-02 22:38:45 
Re: Missed It By That Much
Butch Malahide <fred.g  2008-05-03 15:14:16 
Re: Missed It By That Much
dbd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (D  2008-05-03 20:46:38 
Re: Missed It By That Much
Butch Malahide <fred.g  2008-05-02 21:01:05 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Mon Dec 1 20:03:34 CST 2008.