Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Science Fiction > Written > Re: questionabl...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 37 of 87 Topic 21144 of 23003
Post > Topic >>

Re: questionable conception

by Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 23, 2008 at 11:03 PM

"Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
news:c0OPj.203$506.178@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

> Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote:
>> "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>> news:_vzPj.9658$V14.5506@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>> Dorothy J Heydt wrote:
>>>> In article <02dPj.3522$h75.3149@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>>>> Mike Schilling <mscottschilling@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>> James Nicoll wrote:
>>>>>> In article <1208801575@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Wayne Throop
>>>>>> <throopw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Apparently, he doesn't know who's conception was
>>>>>>>>>>> immaculate.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> A****in Skywalker's?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> No, Shmi Skywalker.  She was born without the original
>>>>>>>>> defect that
>>>>>>>>> normally suppresses midichlorian development in fetuses
>>>>>>>>> at much lower levels.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Dorothy J Heydt)
>>>>>>>> Is that what they wound up saying?  I never saw Eipisodes
>>>>>>>> II or III.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No, not really.  A****in's midichlorian count remains
>>>>>>> unexplained, and
>>>>>>> in fact is rarely mentioned again, and Shmi just goes off
>>>>>>> and gets
>>>>>>> killed to provide enough angst/anger/whatnot to start
>>>>>>> A****in on his
>>>>>>> path
>>>>>>> to the Dark Side.  But hey, it's a theory.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Another explanation is that the Jedi who knocked her up
>>>>>> then erased her memories so that his little transgression
>>>>>> would never be
>>>>>> detected
>>>>>
>>>>> One of the few instances where the finger wave wasn't done
>>>>> with a finger.
>>>>
>>>> Meh.  There was such a simple explanation, and Lucas didn't
>>>> bother to go for it.  She was a SLAVE.  Slaves get raped a
>>>> lot. How is a slave to know which of a dozen trans****t
>>>> workers, slave-market staff, and miscellaneous passersby
>>>> fathered her baby?
>>>
>>> Lucas was trying to make A****in's conception mysterious and
>>> intriguing, not commonplace and distasteful.
>>>
>> Pity he failed. That would have been interesting.
> 
> Failed miserably, both in concept and execution.  I don't dipute
> that. But the point of the "virgin birth" business was
> *supposed* to be "He's special" not simply "We don't know who
> his Dad was". 
> 
If you're referring to A****in Skywalker, I believe the point was 
"Spend money on Star Wars merchandising, because I want a new 
boat."

-- 
Terry Austin

"There's no law west of the internet."
    - Nick Stump

Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.
 




 87 Posts in Topic:
questionable conception
throopw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-21 04:44:20 
Re: questionable conception
djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-21 05:11:47 
Re: questionable conception
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-04-21 05:52:36 
Re: questionable conception
djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-21 14:57:46 
Re: questionable conception
Kevin <ktn3654@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 20:38:44 
Re: questionable conception
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-04-21 21:04:01 
Re: questionable conception
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-04-23 21:25:32 
Re: questionable conception
djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 23:40:28 
Re: questionable conception
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-04-23 23:51:58 
Re: questionable conception
djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 00:01:07 
Re: questionable conception
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-04-24 02:59:29 
Re: questionable conception
Kevin <ktn3654@[EMAIL   2008-04-24 00:52:30 
Re: questionable conception
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-04-24 03:01:17 
Re: questionable conception
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-04-24 03:23:44 
Re: questionable conception
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-04-25 05:59:21 
Re: questionable conception
dbd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (D  2008-04-24 23:01:44 
Re: questionable conception
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-04-25 16:35:24 
Re: questionable conception
throopw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-21 23:16:48 
Re: questionable conception
"Mike Schilling"  2008-04-22 03:34:45 
Re: questionable conception
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-04-23 21:26:17 
Re: questionable conception
"Mike Schilling"  2008-04-23 21:56:10 
Re: questionable conception
"Mike Schilling"  2008-04-21 06:39:47 
Re: questionable conception
Sean O'Hara <seanohara  2008-04-21 11:46:20 
Re: questionable conception
throopw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-21 07:03:15 
Re: questionable conception
djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-21 15:03:47 
Re: questionable conception
Will in New Haven <bil  2008-04-21 09:26:05 
Re: questionable conception
"Mike Schilling"  2008-04-22 03:36:18 
Re: questionable conception
throopw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-21 18:12:55 
Re: questionable conception
jdnicoll@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-04-21 18:24:09 
Re: questionable conception
"Mike Schilling"  2008-04-22 03:35:24 
Re: questionable conception
djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-22 15:26:01 
Re: questionable conception
"Mike Schilling"  2008-04-22 22:09:13 
Re: questionable conception
Sean O'Hara <seanohara  2008-04-23 11:34:01 
Re: questionable conception
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-04-23 21:22:49 
Re: questionable conception
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-04-23 21:19:10 
Re: questionable conception
"Mike Schilling"  2008-04-23 21:39:20 
Re: questionable conception
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-04-23 23:03:16 
Re: questionable conception
"Mike Schilling"  2008-04-23 16:10:30 
Re: questionable conception
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-04-23 23:19:55 
Re: questionable conception
wdstarr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 19:20:19 
Re: questionable conception
norrin <adweiland@[EMA  2008-04-23 07:03:22 
Re: questionable conception
Sean O'Hara <seanohara  2008-04-23 11:35:22 
Re: questionable conception
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-04-23 10:29:58 
Re: questionable conception
herwin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-26 10:59:26 
Re: questionable conception
"Mike Schilling"  2008-04-26 08:36:40 
Re: questionable conception
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-04-23 17:26:37 
Re: questionable conception
djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 18:17:45 
Re: questionable conception
dbd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (D  2008-04-23 11:58:49 
Re: questionable conception
djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 21:12:23 
Re: questionable conception
"Mike Schilling"  2008-04-23 21:37:38 
Re: questionable conception
William George Ferguson &  2008-04-23 15:53:09 
Re: questionable conception
dbd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (D  2008-04-23 16:20:06 
Re: questionable conception
djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 23:42:59 
Re: questionable conception
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-04-24 00:16:30 
Re: questionable conception
Taki Kogoma <quirk@[EM  2008-04-23 20:20:33 
Re: questionable conception
dbd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (D  2008-04-23 18:03:32 
Re: questionable conception
dbd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (D  2008-04-23 18:01:57 
Re: questionable conception
tmcd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-04-25 21:19:47 
Re: questionable conception
"Nobody in particula  2008-04-25 22:28:06 
Re: questionable conception
wdstarr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-26 20:42:57 
Re: questionable conception
Steve Coltrin <spcoltr  2008-04-30 14:53:45 
Re: questionable conception
Graham Woodland <gray@  2008-04-23 21:32:27 
Re: questionable conception
djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 21:13:20 
Re: questionable conception
Kurt Busiek <kurt@[EMA  2008-04-23 14:23:18 
Re: questionable conception
djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 23:45:09 
Re: questionable conception
cryptoguy <treifamily@  2008-04-30 15:07:16 
Re: questionable conception
"Mike Schilling"  2008-04-30 15:55:11 
Re: questionable conception
throopw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 06:43:41 
Re: questionable conception
lal_truckee <lal_truck  2008-04-22 16:49:51 
Re: questionable conception
throopw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-22 17:17:12 
Re: questionable conception
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-04-22 17:43:56 
Re: questionable conception
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-04-23 21:28:02 
Re: questionable conception
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-04-23 22:52:01 
Re: questionable conception
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-04-23 23:02:26 
Re: questionable conception
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-04-23 23:13:33 
Re: questionable conception
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-04-23 23:19:19 
Re: questionable conception
throopw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-22 18:00:08 
Re: questionable conception
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-04-22 18:19:10 
Re: questionable conception
Andrew Plotkin <erkyra  2008-04-22 18:58:16 
Re: questionable conception
"Dan Tilque" &l  2008-04-23 07:38:14 
Re: questionable conception
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-04-23 21:28:44 
Re: questionable conception
djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 23:46:56 
Re: questionable conception
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-04-24 03:02:07 
Re: questionable conception
Aaron Denney <wnoise@[  2008-04-24 04:22:56 
Re: questionable conception
"Christopher Adams&q  2008-04-24 04:33:36 
Re: questionable conception
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-04-24 04:48:10 
Re: questionable conception
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-04-24 16:21:49 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Mon Dec 1 20:12:43 CST 2008.