Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Science Fiction > Written > Re: questionabl...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 52 of 87 Topic 21144 of 23003
Post > Topic >>

Re: questionable conception

by dbd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (David DeLaney) Apr 23, 2008 at 04:20 PM

Mike Schilling <mscottschilling@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>Dorothy J Heydt wrote:
>> David DeLaney <dbd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 18:17:45 GMT, Dorothy J Heydt
>>> <djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>> With Gandalf, it's a bit different.  In the first place, he is
>>>> not of humble origins.  He is a Maia, a spirit of the second
>>>> rank, created _ex nihilo_ by Eru Iluvatar.  For him to be
>>>> incarnated as something that looked rather like a Man, and sent to
>>>> Middle-Earth to aid its inhabitants and oppose Sauron, must have
>>>> been something of a let-down.
>>>
>>> Oh, I don't know; we might think of ... the world, gah, lost the
>>> word for it for a moment ... Arda as the equivalent of an RPPvP
>>> server. He did level up at least once during the series, after all.
>>
>> Yes, from Grey to White.  But I'm talking about his initial
>> change from a bodiliess spirit dweling in peace in Aman, to a
>> carnate being that has to eat and drink and sleep and is addicted
>> to nicotine.

Well, yeah, there's always a learning period for the new user interface.

But - Aman? Do you mean from the stuff that was around before Arda was
made,
or am I missing something about Aman containing unbodied spirits as well
as
the incarnated Vala and Maia? I thought they all took on form and shape
when
they entered the world originally? (Yeah, okay, Melkor and Sauron, and
Saruman, all take tem****ary spirit form on being defeated ... and, okay,
Sauron came back from that state at least twice. But I didn't think the
Maia were wandering around bodiless in Aman until sent on specific
missions?)

>Why bodiless?  The elves didn't become bodiless when they lived in the 
>West (they kept having children, for one thing.) 

Dorothy's referring to _before_ Arda was created (or I thought so before
rereading what she wrote and noticing the 'Aman', anyway). Several fairly
im****tant concepts didn't exist before then; if I remember right, spatial
directions were one of them (though there had to be time Beforehand,
because
things were still happening in order). It's hard to have bodies if there's
literally no place for them to exist in.

The Elves that went West were still inside the walls of the world; even
after
the Earth was bent, that didn't remove Aman from Arda as such, it just
made
getting there from Middle-Earth much more difficult. So they kept their
bodies
there, could make new ones, etc.

[This part of my reply has been made irrelevant, but hey.]

Dave
-- 
\/David	DeLaney	posting	from dbd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 "It's not the pot that	grows the
flower
It's not the clock that	slows the hour 	The definition's plain for anyone
to see
Love is	all it takes to	make a family" - R&P. VISUALIZE	HAPPYNET
VRbeable<BLINK>
http://www.vic.com/~dbd/
- net.legends FAQ & Magic / I WUV you in all
CAPS! --K.
 




 87 Posts in Topic:
questionable conception
throopw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-21 04:44:20 
Re: questionable conception
djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-21 05:11:47 
Re: questionable conception
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-04-21 05:52:36 
Re: questionable conception
djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-21 14:57:46 
Re: questionable conception
Kevin <ktn3654@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 20:38:44 
Re: questionable conception
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-04-21 21:04:01 
Re: questionable conception
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-04-23 21:25:32 
Re: questionable conception
djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 23:40:28 
Re: questionable conception
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-04-23 23:51:58 
Re: questionable conception
djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 00:01:07 
Re: questionable conception
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-04-24 02:59:29 
Re: questionable conception
Kevin <ktn3654@[EMAIL   2008-04-24 00:52:30 
Re: questionable conception
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-04-24 03:01:17 
Re: questionable conception
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-04-24 03:23:44 
Re: questionable conception
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-04-25 05:59:21 
Re: questionable conception
dbd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (D  2008-04-24 23:01:44 
Re: questionable conception
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-04-25 16:35:24 
Re: questionable conception
throopw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-21 23:16:48 
Re: questionable conception
"Mike Schilling"  2008-04-22 03:34:45 
Re: questionable conception
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-04-23 21:26:17 
Re: questionable conception
"Mike Schilling"  2008-04-23 21:56:10 
Re: questionable conception
"Mike Schilling"  2008-04-21 06:39:47 
Re: questionable conception
Sean O'Hara <seanohara  2008-04-21 11:46:20 
Re: questionable conception
throopw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-21 07:03:15 
Re: questionable conception
djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-21 15:03:47 
Re: questionable conception
Will in New Haven <bil  2008-04-21 09:26:05 
Re: questionable conception
"Mike Schilling"  2008-04-22 03:36:18 
Re: questionable conception
throopw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-21 18:12:55 
Re: questionable conception
jdnicoll@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-04-21 18:24:09 
Re: questionable conception
"Mike Schilling"  2008-04-22 03:35:24 
Re: questionable conception
djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-22 15:26:01 
Re: questionable conception
"Mike Schilling"  2008-04-22 22:09:13 
Re: questionable conception
Sean O'Hara <seanohara  2008-04-23 11:34:01 
Re: questionable conception
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-04-23 21:22:49 
Re: questionable conception
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-04-23 21:19:10 
Re: questionable conception
"Mike Schilling"  2008-04-23 21:39:20 
Re: questionable conception
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-04-23 23:03:16 
Re: questionable conception
"Mike Schilling"  2008-04-23 16:10:30 
Re: questionable conception
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-04-23 23:19:55 
Re: questionable conception
wdstarr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 19:20:19 
Re: questionable conception
norrin <adweiland@[EMA  2008-04-23 07:03:22 
Re: questionable conception
Sean O'Hara <seanohara  2008-04-23 11:35:22 
Re: questionable conception
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-04-23 10:29:58 
Re: questionable conception
herwin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-26 10:59:26 
Re: questionable conception
"Mike Schilling"  2008-04-26 08:36:40 
Re: questionable conception
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-04-23 17:26:37 
Re: questionable conception
djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 18:17:45 
Re: questionable conception
dbd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (D  2008-04-23 11:58:49 
Re: questionable conception
djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 21:12:23 
Re: questionable conception
"Mike Schilling"  2008-04-23 21:37:38 
Re: questionable conception
William George Ferguson &  2008-04-23 15:53:09 
Re: questionable conception
dbd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (D  2008-04-23 16:20:06 
Re: questionable conception
djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 23:42:59 
Re: questionable conception
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-04-24 00:16:30 
Re: questionable conception
Taki Kogoma <quirk@[EM  2008-04-23 20:20:33 
Re: questionable conception
dbd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (D  2008-04-23 18:03:32 
Re: questionable conception
dbd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (D  2008-04-23 18:01:57 
Re: questionable conception
tmcd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-04-25 21:19:47 
Re: questionable conception
"Nobody in particula  2008-04-25 22:28:06 
Re: questionable conception
wdstarr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-26 20:42:57 
Re: questionable conception
Steve Coltrin <spcoltr  2008-04-30 14:53:45 
Re: questionable conception
Graham Woodland <gray@  2008-04-23 21:32:27 
Re: questionable conception
djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 21:13:20 
Re: questionable conception
Kurt Busiek <kurt@[EMA  2008-04-23 14:23:18 
Re: questionable conception
djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 23:45:09 
Re: questionable conception
cryptoguy <treifamily@  2008-04-30 15:07:16 
Re: questionable conception
"Mike Schilling"  2008-04-30 15:55:11 
Re: questionable conception
throopw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 06:43:41 
Re: questionable conception
lal_truckee <lal_truck  2008-04-22 16:49:51 
Re: questionable conception
throopw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-22 17:17:12 
Re: questionable conception
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-04-22 17:43:56 
Re: questionable conception
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-04-23 21:28:02 
Re: questionable conception
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-04-23 22:52:01 
Re: questionable conception
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-04-23 23:02:26 
Re: questionable conception
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-04-23 23:13:33 
Re: questionable conception
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-04-23 23:19:19 
Re: questionable conception
throopw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-22 18:00:08 
Re: questionable conception
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-04-22 18:19:10 
Re: questionable conception
Andrew Plotkin <erkyra  2008-04-22 18:58:16 
Re: questionable conception
"Dan Tilque" &l  2008-04-23 07:38:14 
Re: questionable conception
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-04-23 21:28:44 
Re: questionable conception
djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 23:46:56 
Re: questionable conception
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-04-24 03:02:07 
Re: questionable conception
Aaron Denney <wnoise@[  2008-04-24 04:22:56 
Re: questionable conception
"Christopher Adams&q  2008-04-24 04:33:36 
Re: questionable conception
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-04-24 04:48:10 
Re: questionable conception
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-04-24 16:21:49 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Mon Dec 1 20:03:15 CST 2008.