Re: questionable conception

djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Dorothy J Heydt) wrote in
news:JzsxrG.HG4@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

> In article <Xns9A8992BE79E43taustingmail@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy  <taustinca@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>Kevin <ktn3654@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>>news:fuiu0k$e4p$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
>>
>>> Dorothy J Heydt <djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Not that certain individual butter-for-brains Catholics don't
>>>> try on occasion.  I remember one woman at St. Mary
>>>> Magdalene's who used to go around trying to get people to
>>>> sign a *petition* to the Pope asking him to invest Mary with
>>>> various titles essentially proclaiming her Christ's equal. 
>>>> One was "Co-Redemptrix of Mankind," IIRC.  I don't think she
>>>> ever got any signatures.
>>> 
>>>      The drive to proclaim Mary Co-Redemptrix is still going
>>>      on and 
>>> it seems to have more than just a few sup****ters, as you can
>>> easily find by googling.  Various cardinals and bishops appear
>>> to have announced their sup****t for it.  The petition you
>>> speak of wound up getting several million signatures, as you
>>> can see in the New York Times article linked below.  If the
>>> drive does succeed, it's a safe bet what Protestants will
>>> think. 
>>
>>There's only one signature required. All others are completely 
>>irrelevant. The Catholic Church isn't a democracy.
> 
> That's what I said to myself when this lady came around with her
> petition.

I have to wonder if you were that kind, in your thoughts.
> 
> What I said to her was "No, thank you."
> 
But I have no doubt that you were that polite to her out loud.

-- 
Terry Austin

"There's no law west of the internet."
    - Nick Stump

Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.