Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Science Fiction > Written > Re: questionabl...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 14 of 87 Topic 21144 of 23003
Post > Topic >>

Re: questionable conception

by Gene Ward Smith <gene@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 24, 2008 at 03:23 AM

Terry Austin <taustinca@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in 
news:Xns9A89CBAA5EE34taustingmail@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> http://www.ewtn.com/library/PAPALDOC/P12MUNIF.HTM
>> 
> If it was issued ex cathedra, the Pope might well acknowledge the 
> petitions, but - by Catholic doctrine - it is directly inspired by God, 
> and all else is irrelevant. It would, of course, be expected that many 
> good Catholics would also feel the same inspiration.

I believe there's a theory that forms of devotion which become very
popular 
with the laity need to be taken seriously, even if not ultimately
approved. 
The Miraculous Medal would be a case in point. Thérèse de Lisieux's Story 
of a Soul became wildly popular and it took all of 17 years for Saint Pius

X to open the process of canonization, and 28 years for her to become an 
official saint. JP2 declared her to be a Doctor of the Church, despite the

fact that she was hardly an intellectual:

"Sometimes, when I read spiritual treatises, in which perfection is shown 
with a thousand obstacles in the way and a host of illusions round about 
it, my poor little mind soon grows weary, I close the learned book, which 
leaves my head splitting and my heart parched, and I take the Holy 
Scriptures. Then all seems luminous, a single word opens up infinite 
horizons to my soul, perfection seems easy; I see that it is enough to 
realize one's nothingness, and give oneself wholly, like a child, into the

arms of the good God. Leaving to great souls, great minds, the fine books
I 
cannot understand, I rejoice to be little because 'only children, and
those 
who are like them, will be admitted to the heavenly banquet'."

So her poor little mind was very definitely on the fast track. On the
other 
hand, don't hold your breath waiting for Thomas Merton to be cannonized, 
much less doctored, despite his great popularity. So there is more to it 
than that.
 




 87 Posts in Topic:
questionable conception
throopw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-21 04:44:20 
Re: questionable conception
djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-21 05:11:47 
Re: questionable conception
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-04-21 05:52:36 
Re: questionable conception
djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-21 14:57:46 
Re: questionable conception
Kevin <ktn3654@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 20:38:44 
Re: questionable conception
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-04-21 21:04:01 
Re: questionable conception
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-04-23 21:25:32 
Re: questionable conception
djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 23:40:28 
Re: questionable conception
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-04-23 23:51:58 
Re: questionable conception
djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 00:01:07 
Re: questionable conception
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-04-24 02:59:29 
Re: questionable conception
Kevin <ktn3654@[EMAIL   2008-04-24 00:52:30 
Re: questionable conception
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-04-24 03:01:17 
Re: questionable conception
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-04-24 03:23:44 
Re: questionable conception
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-04-25 05:59:21 
Re: questionable conception
dbd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (D  2008-04-24 23:01:44 
Re: questionable conception
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-04-25 16:35:24 
Re: questionable conception
throopw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-21 23:16:48 
Re: questionable conception
"Mike Schilling"  2008-04-22 03:34:45 
Re: questionable conception
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-04-23 21:26:17 
Re: questionable conception
"Mike Schilling"  2008-04-23 21:56:10 
Re: questionable conception
"Mike Schilling"  2008-04-21 06:39:47 
Re: questionable conception
Sean O'Hara <seanohara  2008-04-21 11:46:20 
Re: questionable conception
throopw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-21 07:03:15 
Re: questionable conception
djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-21 15:03:47 
Re: questionable conception
Will in New Haven <bil  2008-04-21 09:26:05 
Re: questionable conception
"Mike Schilling"  2008-04-22 03:36:18 
Re: questionable conception
throopw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-21 18:12:55 
Re: questionable conception
jdnicoll@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-04-21 18:24:09 
Re: questionable conception
"Mike Schilling"  2008-04-22 03:35:24 
Re: questionable conception
djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-22 15:26:01 
Re: questionable conception
"Mike Schilling"  2008-04-22 22:09:13 
Re: questionable conception
Sean O'Hara <seanohara  2008-04-23 11:34:01 
Re: questionable conception
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-04-23 21:22:49 
Re: questionable conception
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-04-23 21:19:10 
Re: questionable conception
"Mike Schilling"  2008-04-23 21:39:20 
Re: questionable conception
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-04-23 23:03:16 
Re: questionable conception
"Mike Schilling"  2008-04-23 16:10:30 
Re: questionable conception
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-04-23 23:19:55 
Re: questionable conception
wdstarr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 19:20:19 
Re: questionable conception
norrin <adweiland@[EMA  2008-04-23 07:03:22 
Re: questionable conception
Sean O'Hara <seanohara  2008-04-23 11:35:22 
Re: questionable conception
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-04-23 10:29:58 
Re: questionable conception
herwin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-26 10:59:26 
Re: questionable conception
"Mike Schilling"  2008-04-26 08:36:40 
Re: questionable conception
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-04-23 17:26:37 
Re: questionable conception
djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 18:17:45 
Re: questionable conception
dbd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (D  2008-04-23 11:58:49 
Re: questionable conception
djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 21:12:23 
Re: questionable conception
"Mike Schilling"  2008-04-23 21:37:38 
Re: questionable conception
William George Ferguson &  2008-04-23 15:53:09 
Re: questionable conception
dbd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (D  2008-04-23 16:20:06 
Re: questionable conception
djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 23:42:59 
Re: questionable conception
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-04-24 00:16:30 
Re: questionable conception
Taki Kogoma <quirk@[EM  2008-04-23 20:20:33 
Re: questionable conception
dbd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (D  2008-04-23 18:03:32 
Re: questionable conception
dbd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (D  2008-04-23 18:01:57 
Re: questionable conception
tmcd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-04-25 21:19:47 
Re: questionable conception
"Nobody in particula  2008-04-25 22:28:06 
Re: questionable conception
wdstarr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-26 20:42:57 
Re: questionable conception
Steve Coltrin <spcoltr  2008-04-30 14:53:45 
Re: questionable conception
Graham Woodland <gray@  2008-04-23 21:32:27 
Re: questionable conception
djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 21:13:20 
Re: questionable conception
Kurt Busiek <kurt@[EMA  2008-04-23 14:23:18 
Re: questionable conception
djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 23:45:09 
Re: questionable conception
cryptoguy <treifamily@  2008-04-30 15:07:16 
Re: questionable conception
"Mike Schilling"  2008-04-30 15:55:11 
Re: questionable conception
throopw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 06:43:41 
Re: questionable conception
lal_truckee <lal_truck  2008-04-22 16:49:51 
Re: questionable conception
throopw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-22 17:17:12 
Re: questionable conception
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-04-22 17:43:56 
Re: questionable conception
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-04-23 21:28:02 
Re: questionable conception
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-04-23 22:52:01 
Re: questionable conception
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-04-23 23:02:26 
Re: questionable conception
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-04-23 23:13:33 
Re: questionable conception
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-04-23 23:19:19 
Re: questionable conception
throopw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-22 18:00:08 
Re: questionable conception
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-04-22 18:19:10 
Re: questionable conception
Andrew Plotkin <erkyra  2008-04-22 18:58:16 
Re: questionable conception
"Dan Tilque" &l  2008-04-23 07:38:14 
Re: questionable conception
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-04-23 21:28:44 
Re: questionable conception
djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 23:46:56 
Re: questionable conception
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-04-24 03:02:07 
Re: questionable conception
Aaron Denney <wnoise@[  2008-04-24 04:22:56 
Re: questionable conception
"Christopher Adams&q  2008-04-24 04:33:36 
Re: questionable conception
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-04-24 04:48:10 
Re: questionable conception
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-04-24 16:21:49 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Mon Dec 1 20:01:49 CST 2008.