In article <fuelo7$6b9$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, William December Starr writes:
>In article <bjeh0457v14oi0jau0l6q65mtnad30e6ti@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Bill Snyder
<bsnyder@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> said:
>> Gene Ward Smith <gene@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> johan.g.larson@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>>>> But are there exceptions? That is, are there field of knowledge
>>>> where the domain experts acknowledge that people in fact
>>>> understand them very well?
>>>
>>> Television appreciation.
>>
>> Oh, hell, not *another* _Star****p Troopers_ thread.
>
>There is no "another" Star****p Troopers thread. All Star****p
>Troopers threads are the same thread.
I think that it's our local version of Godwin's Law:
"As the length of a thread in rasw increases without limit, the odds
of its topic changing to _Star****p Troopers_ approaches 100%."
--
Michael F. Stemper
#include <Standard_Disclaimer>
This email is to be read by its intended recipient only. Any other party
reading is required by the EULA to send me $500.00.